Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Burgett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$437kHuman Services$282kEducation$269kPhilanthropy$125kHealth$125kRecreation & Sports$110kPublic Benefit$60kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANSFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$50,000
WATERFORD CROSSROADS CHURCH$46,000
FRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTER$20,000
HOBBY HORSE HILL EQUESTRIAN CENTER$20,000
LIFEWISE ACADEMY$8,000
DAV$5,500
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$4,000
THE JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL$3,000
AMERICAN LEGION CHARITIES$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$2,000
ST BONAVENTURE INDIAN SCHOOL$1,000
ALHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $320 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%INTERCHURCH SOCIAL SERVICES: $103k → 12%INTERCHURCH SOCIAL SERVICES OF KNOX: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 41 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
30

Total granted

$1.3M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+4%

Still filing today

44%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $112k · revenue +6%
  • HH
    HOBBY HORSE HILL EQUESTRIAN CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +5%
  • IS
    INTERCHURCH SOCIAL SERVICES OF KNOX
    2× · 2017–2020 · $108k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMM FOUND OF MT VERNON &KNOX CO
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • OJ
    OSUCCC - JAMES AND STEPS FOR SARCOM
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
2
Als United Ohio Inc

The mission of als united ohio is to provide comprehensive support and advocacy for people with als and their families, while advancing research for new treatments and an end to als.

Health
3
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
4
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
5
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

—
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
Hospice of Crawford County Inc

To provide quality health and human services in response to identified needs in our service area and to provide for the basic health and human service needs of all persons, regardless of ability to pay.

—
8
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
9
Arthritis Foundation Inc

The arthritis foundation is boldly pursuing a cure for america's #1 cause of disability, while championing the fight against arthritis with life-changing resources, science, advocacy, and community connections.

Health
10
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
11
Our Hospice of South Central Indiana Inc

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services
12
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heartbeat of Morrow County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WATERFORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $319,333 · OtherWATERFORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHASHBROOK: $145,000 · OtherASHBROOKWATERFORD CROSSROADS CHURCH: $115,000 · OtherWATERFORD CROSSROADS CHURCHMANSFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $102,000 · OtherMANSFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOLFRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTER: $55,000 · OtherCOMM FOUND OF MT VERNON &KNOX CO: $50,000 · Other+55 more: $321,601 · Other+55 moreHOBBY HORSE HILL EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $110,000 · Health+5 more: $6,400 · HealthOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $112,000 · EducationINTERCHURCH SOCIAL SERVICES OF KNOX: $108,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,520 · Human ServicesKnox County Foundation: $105,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyLIFEWISE INC: $33,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,107,934Health$116,400Education$112,000Human Services$109,520Philanthropy$105,500Youth Development$34,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $112,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOBBY HORSE HILL EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $110,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetINTERCHURCH SOCIAL SERVICES OF KNOX: $108,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetKnox County Foundation: $105,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMANSFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $102,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTER: $55,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KNOX COUNTY OHIO INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Legion: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeartbeat of Morrow County Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,520 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF MORROW COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RICHLAND COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOBBY HORSE HILL EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERCHURCH SOCIAL SERVICES OF KNOX ↗
  • Who funds Knox County Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MANSFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KNOX COUNTY OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Legion ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knox County FoundationOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knox County Foundation · The Ariel Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Burgett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Burgett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Burgett Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Burgett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Burgett Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph