Skip to content
The Buffalo Group Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Buffalo Group Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$103
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$9kEducation$2kInternational$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kPhilanthropy$716Human Services$700Youth Development$676Religion$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$103
Median grant
3
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$103
DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$103
WILLIAMSVILLE SOUTH GIRL VOLLEYBALL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $103 → 14%SOPHIA THE FIERCE: $400 → 13%SOPHIA THE FIERCE: $100 → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $600 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$10k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE SUMMIT CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +94%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR SISIS KIDS INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • DH
    DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $820 · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • MC
    MISSION COMMUNITY POLICE COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +14%
  • CM
    CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $600 · revenue -10%
  • S
    STARZ24ORG
    one grant, 2020 · $519
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hisis
—
2
Northside Center for Child Development Inc

To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…

Education
3
Mercys Hope
Philanthropy
4
International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc
—
5
Single Cause Single Cure
Health
6
The Chisholm Foundation
—
7
Mission of Mercy
—
8
Jasmine Hill Foundation
—
9
Global Hmr
—
10
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
11
The High Frontier

None

—
12
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches; the most unlike its peers is Amazonsmile Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,021 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION: $1,875 · OtherAMAZONSMILE FOUNDATIONSTARZ24ORG: $519 · OtherSTARZ24ORGIndividual grant recipient: $510 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOSPICE FDT OF WNY: $500 · OtherHOSPICE FDT OF WNYALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $300 · Other+5 more: $557 · Other+5 moreTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $4,141 · EducationTHE SUMMIT CENTER INCHOPE FOR SISIS KIDS INC: $1,750 · EducationHOPE FOR SISIS KIDS INC+1 more: $200 · EducationCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $600 · Human ServicesCITY MISS…SOPHIA THE FIERCE INC: $500 · Human ServicesSOPHIA TH…Circle of Concern Inc: $200 · Human ServicesCircle of…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $103 · Human ServicesAmerican …DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $820 · HealthHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $506 · HealthMISSION COMMUNITY POLICE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHarris Hill Fire Company Inc: $100 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC: $716 · Philanthropy
Other$6,282Education$6,091Human Services$1,403Health$1,326Public Safety & Disaster$1,100Philanthropy$716

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $4,141 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION: $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR SISIS KIDS INC: $1,750 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMISSION COMMUNITY POLICE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $820 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC: $716 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $506 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOPHIA THE FIERCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMHERST POLICE CLUB INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCircle of Concern Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarris Hill Fire Company Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Buffalo Group Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Buffalo Group Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Buffalo Group Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Buffalo Group Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buffalo Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home