Skip to content
The Brooklyn Home for Aged Men at a glance

· Private foundation

The Brooklyn Home for Aged Men

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$150kHuman Services$65kHousing & Shelter$57kFood & Nutrition$49kArts & Culture$48kEducation$34kRecreation & Sports$30kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,150
Median grant
2
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Arc of Monmouth Grant$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
The Arc of Monmouth Donation$7,150
Atlantic Highland First Aid Donation$500
Eden II & Genesis Foundation Donation$275
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JCC OF STATEN ISLAND: $20k → 11%JCC OF STATEN ISLAND: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$343k · 9 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

$343k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+99%

Still filing today

78%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARC OF MONMOUTH INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $51k · revenue +57%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SI INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +65%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $23k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • MA
    Monmouth Arts
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • PC
    PEACE CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +345%
  • BC
    BROOKDALE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
2
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
3
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
4
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Arc of Bergen and Passaic Counties Inc

To provide enhanced opportunities for all citizens of bergen and passaic counties with intellectual and other disabilities and their families through advocacy, community education, direct services, and customized supports to help these…

—
12
The Arc of Essex County Inc

The arc of essex county provides advocacy and services empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to realize a lifetime of personal achievement and full partnership in the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Monmouth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Freehold Area Open Door Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRASTATE FOUNDATION: $57,000 · OtherCENTRASTATE FOUNDATIONTHE ARC OF MONMOUTH INC: $51,300 · OtherTHE ARC OF MONMOUTH INCBLESSING BAG BRIGADE NJ: $34,000 · OtherBLESSING BAG BRIGADE NJMONMOUTH MUSEUM: $30,000 · OtherMONMOUTH MUSEUMPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $22,500 · OtherPROJECT HOSPITALITY INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherThe Arc of Monmouth Grant: $10,000 · OtherMonmouth Arts: $10,000 · OtherBROOKDALE COLLEGE: $10,000 · Other+15 more: $39,942 · Other+15 moreCENTRASTATE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthCENTRASTATE HEAL…PEACE CARE INC: $10,000 · HealthPEACE CARE INC+2 more: $2,500 · HealthLUNCH BREAK INC: $48,000 · Food & NutritionLUNCH BREAK …JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SI INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 · EducationSTATEN ISLAND ACADEMY: $2,500 · EducationMonmouth County Historical Association: $1,500 · Arts & CultureFreehold Area Open Door Inc: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$274,742Health$62,500Food & Nutrition$48,000Human Services$30,000Education$22,500Arts & Culture$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARC OF MONMOUTH INC: $51,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRASTATE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $48,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLESSING BAG BRIGADE NJ: $34,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SI INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSTATEN ISLAND ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT RESOURCES CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMonmouth County Historical Association: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreehold Area Open Door Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ARC OF MONMOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRASTATE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSING BAG BRIGADE NJ ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SI INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds STATEN ISLAND ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ADULT RESOURCES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Monmouth County Historical Association ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Freehold Area Open Door Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Investors Foundation …Oceanfirst FoundationThe Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Investors Foundation IncNJ15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Oceanfirst Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brooklyn Home for Aged Men funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brooklyn Home for Aged Men. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Brooklyn Home for Aged Men?

Find your warmest path to The Brooklyn Home for Aged Men through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brooklyn Home for Aged Men’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home