Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Brethen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Health$26kEducation$16kCrime & Legal$6kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$5kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$500Arts & Culture$100
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$815k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERISTY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION$10,000
CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$10,000
CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$10,000
NRA FOUNDATION INC$6,000
PELOTONIA$5,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$5,000
SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS$2,000
RIKKI'S REFUGE ANIMAL SHELTER$500
AMERICAN ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$275
SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS$240
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$119
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $240 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
North Shore Animal League America Inc

Since 1944, the north shore animal league america's mission has been to save the lives of pets through adoption, rescue, education, medical care, spay/neuter and advocacy.

Animals
4
Raskels Rescue
Animals
5
The Jack Canine Foundation
6
Tootsie Dog Rescue Foundation
Animals
7
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
8
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
9
America's Vetdogs the Veterans K-9 Corps Inc

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for…

Public Benefit
10
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
11
For the Love of Street Dogs
Animals
12
St Clouds Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Adopt a Pit Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $20,275 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONTHE UNIVERISTY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERISTY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATIONTHE TENNESSEE FUND — $1,400 · Other+5 more — $2,600 · Other+5 morePELOTONIA — $5,000 · EducationPELOTONIAWESTERVILLE SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationWESTERVILLE SUNRIS…NRA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Crime & LegalNRA FOUNDAT…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TO…Smoky Mountain Service Dogs — $4,240 · Human ServicesADOPT A PIT RESCUE — $1,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $119 · Animals
Other$34,275Education$10,000Crime & Legal$6,000Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$4,240Animals$1,119

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $20,275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNRA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERVILLE SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs — $4,240 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADOPT A PIT RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $119 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Brethen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brethen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Brethen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph