Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brant Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$27kFood & Nutrition$25kHuman Services$24kEducation$18kRecreation & Sports$4kYouth Development$3k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$364k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank$5,000
Salvation Army$2,500
Massanutten Vocational Technical Center Foundation$2,500
Valley Program for Aging Services Inc$2,500
Salvation Army$2,500
Valley Mission Inc$2,000
Washington & Lee University$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Valley Program for Aging Services Inc: $3k → 8%Valley Program for Aging Services Inc: $3k → 8%Valley Program for Aging Services Inc: $2k → 8%Valley Program for Aging Services Inc: $2k → 8%People Helping People Inc: $3k → 11%Valley Program for Aging Services Inc: $2k → 8%People Helping People Inc: $3k → 11%People Helping People Inc: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 8 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$89k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • MT
    MASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +701% · 63% of their budget
  • SM
    STILL MEADOWS ENRICHMENT CENTER AND CAMP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • RW
    Ride With Pride Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -19%
  • JM
    JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Sky Therapeutic Riding and Respite

To provide a safe happy and healthy therapeutic community that works to empower and propel our special needs citizens and their families to their fullest potential. We serve our valued clients by providing therapeutic horseback riding…

Human Services
2
Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.

Food & Nutrition
3
Valley Mission Inc

Valley Mission currently operates a Food Pantry. New services offered in the new facility will inlcude an 18-bed emergency shelter, commercial kitchen/dining area, office space, medical clinic, 16-bed transformational living program (6…

Human Services
4
Fluvanna Meals On Wheels

The organization's purpose is to provide meals to the ederly, disabled, and homebound in fluvanna county, virginia.

Food & Nutrition
5
WagonWheels Hub

To help individuals with disabilities strengthen their core muscles by riding a horse. We help them ride a horse. Also by being able to handle a large horse with the help of our volunteers gives them confidence and gives them a reason to…

Animals
6
Feed My Sheep Food Outreach Inc

It is our mission to provide food, clothing, household cleaning supplies, and personal hygiene products to low income seniors, veterans, homeless, children, and families.

Food & Nutrition
7
Meals On Wheels-Bullhead City Az

Meals on Wheels delivers between 140-160 meals daily to homebound patients and serves approximately 50-60 clients daily at the Senior Center. The program averages between 40,000-45,000 meals yearly for seniors and disabled clients in…

Food & Nutrition
8
Muleshoe Meals On Wheels Inc

The Muleshoe Meals on Wheels purpose is to engage in all activities necessary, useful, or expedient, through operative measures and active organizations, to promote and further the interests of the Senior citizens of the area. The purpose…

—
9
Healing Strides of Virginia

To promote wellness for people with personal challenges who can benefit from equine-assisted activities and therapies in a safe and supportive environment.

—
10
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
11
Brookings Back Pack Project

The mission of the brookings backpack projecs is to assist children and youth in brookings county, sd who may not have enough food to eat at home by providing them with easy-to-prepare weekend meals and snacks throughout the year. by…

Food & Nutrition
12
Greater Wyoming Valley Area Ymca

The greater wyoming valley area ymca (gwva ymca) is a volunteer led public charity that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. our mission is to put christian principles into practice through…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Program for Aging Services; the most unlike its peers is Washington and Lee University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCSalvation Army: $21,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyBlue Ridge Community College: $6,000 · OtherBlue Ridge Community College+5 more: $8,500 · Other+5 moreVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $11,500 · Human ServicesVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGI…PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE …VALLEY MISSION INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterVALLEY MISS…MASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationWashington and Lee University: $2,000 · EducationSTILL MEADOWS ENRICHMENT CENTER AND CAMP: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$60,500Human Services$19,500Housing & Shelter$10,000Education$7,500Recreation & Sports$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY MISSION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC: $8,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetMASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 63% of budgetRide With Pride Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTILL MEADOWS ENRICHMENT CENTER AND CAMP: $1,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brant Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brant Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brant Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Brant Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brant’s filings →

    More from the funding graph