· Private foundation
Bogatin Foundation II
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ISREAL TENNIS AND ED | $25,000 |
| ALL ABOUT THE CAT RESCUE | $14,307 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| CARING FIELDS FELINES | $5,000 |
| BERKSHIRE HILLS EISENBERG CAMP | $1,000 |
| FUREVR SAVED | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAAll About The Cats Rescue Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $234k · revenue -63% · 68% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2017–2018 · $193k
- ITISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $178k
Funded once
- CACHANCE AT LIFE CAT RESCUE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +2%
- I1IMPACT 100 PBCone grant, 2024 · $2k
- MMISCELLANEOUSone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…
Purrs and Whiskers primary function is to find forever homes for cats and kittens that are abandoned, stray, owner turn in, injured/sick, and/or born in feral colonies after we have fully vetted them by spaying/neutering, vaccinating,…
To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.
To rescue, rehabilitate, provide veterinary care, and rehome homeless cats.
Animal welfare for New York City street cats. Provide sanctuary, adoption and fostering. Promote TNR, manage feral cat colonies. Humane education through presentations, videos and our website.
To manage feral and stray cat populations. The process involves trapping the cats in a humane manner, getting them spayed or neutered, vaccinated against rabies, and then returning them to their original location.
To help end euthanasia of unwanted cats by caring for feral and abandoned felines, spaying or neutering them and when appropriate, adopting them out. Monies donated are used for food, litter, bedding and medical expenses.
Provides shelter, food, veterinary services and medicine for abandoned and stray cats. No cats are euthanized. All are placed in homes, foster homes or remain at the shelter.
Animal rescue and welfare
Cat Rescue
To reduce outdoor cat population in New York City through Trap, Neuter, Return (TNR), owner surrender prevention, and rescue, foster, and adoption of stray unowned outdoor cats.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caring Fields Felines Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds All About The Cats Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FIELDS FELINES INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds CHANCE AT LIFE CAT RESCUE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds FUREVER SAVED INC ↗
- Who funds CITY CRITTERS INC ↗
- Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bogatin Foundation II funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.