Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Boch Family Foundation (D/B/A Music Drives Us)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$184k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of THE BOCH FAMILY FOUNDATION (D/B/A MUSIC DRIVES US)’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERMONT AGENCY OF EDUCATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$26,257
MUSIC FORWARD FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$9,710
GUITAR CENTER$2,691
HOLLISTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
WORCESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
BARNSTABLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
WALPOLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
READING PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
ROCKLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
WESTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
REVERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$684
DAYNA BRUNELLI MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BALCH SCHOOL: $2k → 7%BARNSTABLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 8%ROCKLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 8%BOSTON THEATER CRITICS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%GLOUCESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 10%AMPP WORCESTER- WORCESTER POLICE DEPT: $3k → 11%MANSFIELD INSTRUMENT DONATION: $5k → 11%REVERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $684 → 16%FALCETTI MUSIC: $26k → 17%MUSIC FORWARD FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%DAYNA BRUNELLI MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP: $150 → 5%WALPOLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 7%DUFFY HEALTH CENTER: $116 → 8%READING PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 8%WHITMAN-HANSON REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3k → 11%MAKE-A-WISH: $7k → 16%FALCETTI PANOS: $10k → 17%MUSIC FORWARD FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%DAYNA BRUNELLI MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP: $150 → 5%DEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 7%SANDWICH MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 8%BIRCHES SCHOOL: $6k → 8%WACHUSETT REG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3k → 11%BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 16%HOUSE OF BLUESMUSIC FORWARD FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%DAYNA BRUNELLI MEMORIAL 2022 GOLF TOURNAMENT: $150 → 5%THE TOWN OF WRENTHAM: $3k → 7%LOWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 8%WORCESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 11%BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $12k → 16%DAYNA BRUNELLI MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP: $150 → 5%NATICK HIGH SCHOOL BAND: $3k → 8%MENDON-UPTON REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3k → 11%BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 16%HOLLISTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 8%BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 16%WESTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 8%BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 16%BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $504 → 16%BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY: $9k → 16%BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY: $1k → 16%BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY: $795 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$106k · 3 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
19

Total granted

$106k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-71%
+37%

Still filing today

33%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue -71%
  • BP
    BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2020–2024 · $40k
  • DB
    DAYNA BRUNELLI MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300

Funded once

  • LP
    LOWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +25%
  • M
    MAKE-A-WISH
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VERMONT AGENCY OF EDUCATION — $100,000 · OtherVERMONT AGENCY OF EDUCATIONLOWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherLOWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLSBOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $40,437 · OtherBOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient — $26,257 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+26 more — $72,913 · Other+26 moreLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION — $65,000 · Arts & CultureLIVENATIONORG FOUNDA…BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $11,209 · Arts & CultureBOSTON ARTS ACADEMY …BIRCHES SCHOOL INC — $5,585 · EducationDUFFY HEALTH CENTER INC — $116 · Health
Other$339,607Arts & Culture$76,209Education$5,585Health$116

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $11,209 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRCHES SCHOOL INC — $5,585 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDUFFY HEALTH CENTER INC — $116 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BIRCHES SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds DUFFY HEALTH CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Boch Family Foundation (D/B/A Music Drives Us) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 49%
  • Duffy Health Center Inc49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph