Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Illinois · Public charity

The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute

To provide integrated, family-oriented care, treatment and education for individuals with bleeding, blood clotting and other blood disorders.

$8k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Peoria Area Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’19
0
’20
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2022
$7,500
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$41M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$57k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2022.

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS$7,500

Compare The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute with peer funders

About The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute

How much does The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute give?
The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute reported 1 grants totaling $7,500 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Where is The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute based?
The Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home