Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bixby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$88kEducation$74kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$13kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$3kAnimals$3kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
11
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE LWR CHURCH$9,000
MADONNA UNIVERSITY (KRCATOVICH)$2,500
HOPE COLLEGE (DUESENBERG)$2,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$1,082
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RSRCH HOSPITAL$1,000
CAFE' 1040 - KRAUSE SPONSORSHIP$1,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$1,000
AAA PREGNANCY CENTER$800
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION - VETS$750
UNIVERSITY OF MI - DEARBORN$750
IMA RECREATION-FIRST TEE$500
VOICE OF THE MARTYRS - GLOBAL$500
DETROIT RESCUE MINISTRIES$500
TRUTH FOR LIFE$500
FOOD GATHERERS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $350) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OH
CA
CO
TN
SC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 26 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
49

Total granted

$132k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+56%

Still filing today

31%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TRUTH FOR LIFE
    6× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +97%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +4%
  • ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • MH
    MT HOPE CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +7%
  • MH
    MT HOPE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
2
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over seventy countries around the world.

International
3
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
4
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
5
Wellspire Llc

Guided by christian compassion, wellspire supports the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home.

—
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
8
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
9
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
10
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
11
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associationiowa Chapter

Leading the fight to treat and cure als through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with lou gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

—
12
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNERSTONE LWR CHURCH: $35,500 · OtherCORNERSTONE LWR CHURCHMT HOPE CONGREGATION CHURCH: $25,500 · OtherMT HOPE CONGREGATION CHURCHMT HOPE CHURCH: $8,100 · Other+64 more: $136,252 · Other+64 moreAAA CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $4,800 · HealthDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $1,250 · HealthALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthHOPE COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationTRUTH FOR LIFE: $3,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $300 · ReligionCompassion International Incorporated: $1,082 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalSUPPLY AND MULTIPLY INC: $200 · InternationalLIVONIA GOODFELLOWS INC: $650 · Human ServicesTURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $250 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $750 · Philanthropy
Other$205,352Health$9,000Education$7,000Religion$3,300International$2,282Human Services$1,000Philanthropy$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAAA CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $4,800 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVONIA GOODFELLOWS INC: $650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AAA CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bixby Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bixby Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bixby’s filings →

More from the funding graph