Skip to content
The Beverly J Jewell Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Beverly J Jewell Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$387k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$2.1MReligion$115kEducation$90kHuman Services$49kCommunity Improvement$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $337k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
LEBONHEUR CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$45,000
MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$45,000
SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$45,000
KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$25,000
OPERATION SMILE$25,000
OKIZU FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER$21,000
CITY OF REFUGE COMMUNITIES INC$20,600
ADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH ASSOC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OKIZU FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 13%LE BONHEUR CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%UW SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $30k → 7%PETER DOMOTO FUND FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 9%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 11%CAMP PRIME TIME: $25k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $35k → 10%OKIZU FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $85k → 17%UW SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $30k → 7%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $45k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 11%CAMP PRIME TIME: $25k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $35k → 10%OKIZU FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $77k → 17%UNIVERSTY OF WASHINGTON: $35k → 9%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $45k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 11%CAMP PRIME TIME: $25k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $25k → 10%OKIZU FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $63k → 17%UNIVERSTY OF WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%CAMP PRIME TIME: $25k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $25k → 10%OKIZU FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $45k → 17%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%SHINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $45k → 17%MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%KADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $35k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 13 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$2.4M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

54%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $400k · revenue +99%
  • MB
    MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +50%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $194k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • LB
    Le Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
4
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
5
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
6
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health
7
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
8
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
9
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
12
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary Bridge Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Advances in Neuroblastoma Research Assoc C/O Garrett Brodeur Md Chop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $300,000 · HealthMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $300,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENLe Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $15,000 · HealthKADLEC MEDICAL CENTER: $300,000 · OtherKADLEC MEDICAL CENTEROKIZU FOUNDATION: $184,000 · OtherOKIZU FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $164,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEBONHEUR CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $130,000 · OtherLEBONHEUR CHILDRENS HOSPITALUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $65,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUW SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $60,000 · OtherUW SCHOOL OF DENTISTRYPETER DOMOTO FUND FOR CHILDREN: $49,000 · OtherOPERATION SMILE INC: $194,150 · InternationalCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $146,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationCITY OF REFUGE: $115,000 · ReligionCITY OF REFUGE COMMUNITIES INC: $20,600 · Public Benefit
Health$1,065,000Other$952,000International$194,150Education$171,000Religion$115,000Public Benefit$20,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $300,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $194,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION: $184,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $146,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $115,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLe Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKIZU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds Le Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH ASSOC C/O GARRETT BRODEUR MD CHOP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Blackbaud Giving …
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beverly J Jewell Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beverly J Jewell Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beverly J Jewell Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home