Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bethesda Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$377kHealth$166kEducation$154kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kCrime & Legal$32kReligion$17kYouth Development$6kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEUBEN SENIOR SERVICES FUND$23,100
WOODHULL COMMUNITY CHURCH$15,000
SUNY ALFRED SCHOOL OF NURSING$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
IMPACT$6,000
HORNELL AREA CONCERN FOR YOUTH$6,000
GREATER SOUTHERN TIER BOCES$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,500
ADULT CERTIFIED NURSING ASSISTANTS$2,900
ST ANN'S ACADEMY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VINCENT HOUSE: $10k → 13%VINCENT HOUSE: $10k → 13%HORNELL AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$518k · 13 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +75% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
27

Total granted

$518k
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+75%

Still filing today

31%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $100k · revenue +54%
  • VH
    VINCENT HOUSE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +127%
  • ST
    SOUTHERN TIER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • AS
    ALFRED STATE SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2022 · $43k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • SJ
    ST JAMES HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
2
St Josephs Hospital

Ministers to inpatients and outpatients, serving a primary care and specialty referral center for people from all faiths living in chemung county and the surrounding counties of new york and pennsylvania

—
3
Schofield Home Health Care Services Inc

To provide the highest level of professional and paraprofessional home health care services with care, compassion, and allowing patients to remain in their own home. We meet our mission by operating a licensed home care agency providing…

—
4
Schoellkopf Health Center Inc

Skilled nursing facility providing long-term healthcare services to residents

Health
5
Community Health Action of Staten Island Inc

Community health action of staten island' drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers.

Unclassified
6
Saint Joseph Home Health Care

Saint Joseph Home Health Care seeks to serve the poor, elderly, and disabled in a way that pleases God and honors the dignity of each person.

Health
7
Seneca Health Services Inc

To be the leading provider of behavioral and physical healthcare through compassionate and quality services in our community.

—
8
St Joseph's Health Inc

Health care system management and support

Health
9
Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

To provide end of life care, bereavement counseling and spiritual services to the terminally ill and their families in oneida, herkimer, and eastern madison counties, new york.

—
10
Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
11
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
12
High Peaks Hospice & Palliative Care in

Dignity, comfort and peace at the end of life high peaks hospice & palliative care, inc provides end of life care that listens with respect, cares with compassion, supports with choice, and comforts with understanding wherever you call home

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home & Health Care Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Anns Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $150,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH CAPITAL CAMPAIGNSUNY ALFRED SCHOOL OF NURSING: $120,000 · OtherSUNY ALFRED SCHOOL OF NURSINGALFRED STATE SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY: $43,272 · OtherALFRED STATE SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGYGREATER SOUTHERN TIER BOCES: $40,400 · OtherGREATER SOUTHERN TIER BOCESIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+33 more: $231,207 · Other+33 moreUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCH…STEUBEN SENIOR SERVICES FUND: $23,100 · EducationSTEUBEN SENIOR SER…ST ANNS ACADEMY: $5,370 · EducationST JAMES HOSPITAL: $21,000 · HealthSOUTHERN TIER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC: $3,123 · HealthFAMILY SERVICES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC: $2,000 · HealthVINCENT HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE TRI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $5,207 · Human Services
Other$619,879Education$128,470Health$26,123Human Services$25,207

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEUBEN SENIOR SERVICES FUND: $23,100 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetST JAMES HOSPITAL: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINCENT HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetHOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHORNELL AREA CONCERN FOR YOUTH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetST ANNS ACADEMY: $5,370 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $5,207 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY FLIGHT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds STEUBEN SENIOR SERVICES FUND ↗
  • Who funds ST JAMES HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds VINCENT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HORNELL AREA CONCERN FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN TIER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Southern Tier IncNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Southern Tier Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bethesda Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bethesda Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bethesda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph