Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bessie Rattner Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$161k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$332kPhilanthropy$189kFood & Nutrition$132kCrime & Legal$130kHealth$122kArts & Culture$121kEducation$92kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GALA HISPANIC THEATRE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,432
SAFE PASSAGE$15,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
THE FOOD BANK WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$5,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION$5,000
NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC RADIO$5,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO$3,650
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY RADIO$3,650
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,132
SOUL FIRE FARM$2,500
THE TREVOR PROJECT$2,500
BLUEPRINT GENEVA$2,500
GLSEN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 11%EMBRACE YOUR SISTER: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 33 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+59%

Still filing today

42%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +30%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $43k · revenue +167%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +570%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • C
    CALLISTO
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SB
    SUNFLOWER BAKERY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
4
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Westfield Homeless Cat Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $381,322 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFE PASSAGE: $130,000 · OtherSAFE PASSAGEIndividual grant recipient: $88,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGALA HISPANIC THEATRE: $50,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ZION: $40,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC RADIO: $39,300 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · Other+25 more: $194,557 · Other+25 moreCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $70,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $45,000 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · HealthTREVOR PROJECT INC: $39,500 · Civil RightsGLSEN INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $27,890 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $10,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $43,132 · InternationalMULTIPLIER: $17,933 · EnvironmentC&O CANAL TRUST INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$995,829Food & Nutrition$85,000Health$80,000Civil Rights$54,500Education$47,890International$43,132Environment$27,933

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $43,132 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $39,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $27,890 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $17,933 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLSEN INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $10,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetC&O CANAL TRUST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBLUEPRINT GENEVA INC: $7,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetEMBRACE YOUR SISTERS: $2,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWESTFIELD HOMELESS CAT PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLIER ↗
  • Who funds SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds C&O CANAL TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT GENEVA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bessie Rattner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bessie Rattner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bessie Rattner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bessie Rattner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bessie Rattner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph