Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Beard-Young Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$660k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$877kScience & Tech$390kCrime & Legal$350kPublic Benefit$200kReligion$188kHuman Services$185kInternational$121kHousing & Shelter$101kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDSON ALPHA FOUNDATION$250,000
RANDOLPH SCHOOL$100,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
VILLAGE OF PROMISE$35,000
HUNTSVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION$30,000
NATIONAL CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SHELBY INSTITUTE$25,000
MANNA HOUSE$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION$10,000
ST MARY OF THE VISITATION CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY$10,000
HUNTSVILLE MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
HUNTSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
WELLSTONE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $50k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $35k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $35k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $25k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $10k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 26 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
12

Total granted

$2.4M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

77%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600k · revenue +80%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $350k · revenue +128%
  • VO
    VILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF ORANGE BEACH AL
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • TL
    THE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HUNTSVILLE KEYS TO OPPORTUNITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
2
University of Alabama Health Services Foundation Pc

Coordinate and deliver patient care in a group practice setting within the academic environment of the university of alabama at birmingham.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
4
Huntsville Emergency Medical Services Inc

To provide emergency medical services to the general public and contract ambulance services.

—
5
Alabama Association of Resource Conservation and Development Councils

Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama

Environment
6
The Alabama Center for Law and Civic Education

The mission of ACLCE is to prepare youth to become active, engaged, and informed participants in a democratic society.

—
7
Alabama Forest Land Trust Inc

The Organization focuses on providing services via conservation easements, administration of various grants, educational outreach and planning.

—
8
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
9
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
10
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
11
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
12
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville; the most unlike its peers is The Huntsville Hospital Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $600,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION: $390,000 · EducationHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATIONRANDOLPH SCHOOL: $127,500 · EducationRANDOLPH SCHOOL+3 more: $34,000 · EducationNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $350,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INCCITY OF ORANGE BEACH AL: $200,000 · OtherCITY OF ORANGE BEACH ALEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY: $75,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE NATIVITYIndividual grant recipient: $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATIONST MARY OF THE VISITATION CATHOLIC CHURCH: $55,000 · OtherHUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $36,000 · Other+21 more: $189,000 · Other+21 moreVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $165,000 · Human ServicesKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Human ServicesHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Greater Huntsville: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $101,000 · Housing & ShelterMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE: $65,100 · Arts & CultureThe Vine Pastoral Counseling Center Inc: $55,000 · Religion
Education$1,151,500Other$1,075,500Human Services$177,000Philanthropy$170,000Housing & Shelter$101,000Arts & Culture$65,100Religion$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION: $390,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $350,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $165,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetRANDOLPH SCHOOL: $127,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $120,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetLINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $101,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE: $65,100 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Vine Pastoral Counseling Center Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Greater Huntsville: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $36,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTSVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $17,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMobile Baykeeper Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetVanderbilt University: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAP AND GOWN PROJECT: $9,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Job Corps of Madison County Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetA NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI COMMUNITY TASK FORCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN GOLD STAR MOTHERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Vine Pastoral Counseling Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Baykeeper Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAP AND GOWN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds Christian Job Corps of Madison County Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BACK COUNTRY TRAIL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL40.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation · John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation · The Propst Foundation · Wallace E Kirkpatrick Family Foundation · Alpha Foundation · Parker Griffith Family Foundation · The I3 Cares Foundation · Aerojet Rocketdyne Foundation · Lanier Family Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beard-Young Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beard-Young Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Beard-Young Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Beard-Young Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beard-Young Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph