Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Baszucki Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$14MHealth$5.0MSocial Science$2.6MPublic Benefit$2.3MScience & Tech$243kEmployment$110kCivil Rights$91kArts & Culture$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $201k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $421k
  • $250k+9 grants · $11M
$20,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITE AMERICA INSITITUTE INC$2,300,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$2,173,579
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$1,498,651
MAYO CLINIC$1,380,617
THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$1,001,326
THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$997,605
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$588,112
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$500,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$284,179
MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORPORATION$130,585
CHANCELLOR MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD$100,000
CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCE CENTER INC$100,000
RIPPLE OF HOPE FILMS INC$90,776
SUNDANCE INSTITUTE$35,000
BRAIN FOG RECOVERY SOURCE$20,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIPPLE OF HOPE FILMS INC: $91k → 10%REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2.2M → 11%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $1.5M → 14%CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $100k → 9%STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $3.0M → 7%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $500k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $16k → 14%HEALTH RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%UNITE AMERICA INSITITUTE INC: $2.3M → 12%BRAIN FOG RECOVERY SOURCE: $21k → 9%DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $120k → 14%GLUT1 DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $15k → 21%REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2.1M → 11%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $284k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $500k → 17%HEALTH RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $85k → 11%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES (UCLA): $279k → 14%THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $2.6M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
AR
NC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of The Baszucki Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Baszucki Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 7 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$11M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+48%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +36%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +11%
  • RA
    REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • SB
    STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue +193%
  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2.6M · revenue +42%
  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2023 · $279k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Ripple of Hope Filmsinc Dba New Frontier Films Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $5,155,456 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New YorkUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $4,313,132 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 · EducationSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INCTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,000,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK+2 more: $41,085 · EducationTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $2,641,413 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTETHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $1,782,830 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALI…MAYO CLINIC: $1,380,617 · OtherMAYO CLINICTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $831,292 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALI…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $582,834 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $278,754 · Other+15 more: $366,140 · OtherUNITE AMERICA INSTITUTE INC: $2,300,000 · Public BenefitUNITE AMER…RIPPLE OF HOPE FILMSINC DBA NEW FRONTIER FILMS INC: $90,776 · Arts & CultureSundance Institute: $70,000 · Arts & CultureChildren S Mental Health Resource Center Inc: $100,000 · HealthGLUT1 Deficiency Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $13,333 · HealthREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$13,509,673Other$7,863,880Public Benefit$2,300,000Arts & Culture$160,776Health$128,333Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $5,155,456 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $4,313,132 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $2,641,413 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNITE AMERICA INSTITUTE INC: $2,300,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren S Mental Health Resource Center Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetSundance Institute: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $29,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLUT1 Deficiency Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $13,333 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $11,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNITE AMERICA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Children S Mental Health Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIPPLE OF HOPE FILMSINC DBA NEW FRONTIER FILMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLUT1 Deficiency Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Baszucki Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Baszucki Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baszucki Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph