Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barnes Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$306k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$573kEducation$533kArts & Culture$314kPhilanthropy$94kHuman Services$78kScience & Tech$48kAnimals$32kCommunity Improvement$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $281k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRISTOL PUBLIC SCHOOLS$29,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CT INC$25,000
CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC$20,000
UCONN FOUNDATION$20,000
NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL$20,000
NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC$20,000
HORIZONS AT WESTMINSTER SCHOOL$20,000
CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOCIATION$15,000
UNITED WAY$15,000
CONNECTIKIDS$15,000
READ TO GROW$15,000
CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL$13,000
CONNECTICUT STORY TELLING CENTER$12,000
FLANDERS NATURE CENTER$12,000
THE FAMILY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 28 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
11

Total granted

$1.6M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+41%

Still filing today

61%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +30%
  • NM
    NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +21%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FIRST SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $70k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • CR
    CORTLAND REUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +41%
  • MA
    MYSTIC AQUARIUM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CS
    CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
2
The Children's School

An independent, nonprofit school serving the lower fairfield county area of connecticut for children ages three to eight, and providing an environment that fosters in children the joy of learning through the use of innovative materials and…

Education
3
The College School Association

To explore the world through authentic experiences, empowering students to engage deeply and be ready for what is next.

—
4
Center City Public Charter Schools

Center city public charter schools (center city pcs) empowers our students for lifelong success by building strong character, promoting academic excellence, and generating public service throughout washington, d.c.

Education
5
Stamford Charter School for Excellence

The stamford charter school for excellence prepares young people in stamford, connecticut to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social,…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Center School

Provide a supportive educational setting for students who have experienced difficulties in learning. center school is dedicated to designing educational programs which foster each child's maximum academic, social, and emotional development.

—
8
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
9
Creative City Public Charter School Foundation Inc

Creative City Public Charter School's teachers, students and parents share governance and cooperate on curriculum and community decisions, building on the inquisitive nature of children to drive the project-based arts-integrated…

Education
10
Nurture and Nature Children's Center Inc

In partnership with families, we as an educational community, foster learning in a nurturing, supportive, child-centered environment immersed in nature. we teach, respect and celebrate diversity, individuality, and the whole child.

Human Services
11
New Canaan Community Nursery School Inc

Our mission is to provide a safe and nurturing environment for children to develop socially, creatively, emotionally, physically and cognitavely through the various programs we offer. we operate on the premise that a child's natural…

—
12
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Ecology Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Family Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CT INC: $418,037 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CT INCBRISTOL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $94,000 · OtherBRISTOL PUBLIC SCHOOLSLEAP: $70,000 · OtherLEAPCONNECTIKIDS INC: $60,000 · OtherCONNECTIKIDS INCUNITED WAY: $43,540 · Other+21 more: $317,500 · Other+21 moreNEW ENGLAND CAROUSEL MUSEUM INC: $144,600 · Arts & CultureNEW ENGLAND CAROUSEL…NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC S…CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC: $47,500 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT SCIENCE …CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCHARTER OAK TEMPLE R…CONNECTICUT STORYTELLING CENTER INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT STORYTEL…COMMUNITY FIRST SCHOOL INC: $70,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FIRST …THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $47,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY O…READ TO GROW INC: $45,000 · EducationREAD TO GROW INCTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC: $40,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF WEST…ORGANIZED PARENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE INC: $39,000 · EducationORGANIZED PARENT…TRINITY COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionMAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCORTLAND REUSE INC: $12,000 · Employment
Other$1,003,077Arts & Culture$321,100Education$251,500Food & Nutrition$80,000Philanthropy$50,000Environment$24,000Human Services$20,000Employment$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ENGLAND CAROUSEL MUSEUM INC: $144,600 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST SCHOOL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCONNECTIKIDS INC: $60,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetMAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO GROW INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetORGANIZED PARENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE INC: $39,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT STORYTELLING CENTER INC: $24,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $24,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $17,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCORTLAND REUSE INC: $12,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND CAROUSEL MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds READ TO GROW INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZED PARENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT STORYTELLING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATT NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CORTLAND REUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farmington Bank Community Foundation IncCT24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · The Stocker Foundation · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · The Ahearn Family Foundation · The Fund for Greater Hartford Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · The Betty Knox Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barnes Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barnes Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Organized Parents Make a Difference Inc: 66% of income from government
  • The Bridge Family Center Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Connecticut Science Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Community First School Inc: 9% of income from government
  • New Haven Ecology Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Music School Inc: 4% of income from government
  • New England Carousel Museum Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut Storytelling Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Pratt Nature Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Barnes Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Barnes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barnes’ filings →

More from the funding graph