Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Nevada · Private foundation

The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$4,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$4,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$159k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$4k0%
FY20231$11k0%
FY20221$10k100%
FY20211$6k0%
FY20202$10k0%
FY20191$23k0%
FY20174$13kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$77k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Las Vegas Valley Humane Society$54,56875%
Homeward Bound Cat Adoptions$5007n/a

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($22k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust with peer funders

About The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust

How much does The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust give?
The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust reported 1 grants totaling $4,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (100%).
Who are The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Las Vegas Valley Humane Society ($55k), Homeward Bound Cat Adoptions ($500).
Does The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust based?
The Barbara Jeanne Mitchell Trust is based in NV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barbara Jeanne Mitchell’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home