Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ballard Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2018
14
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$2.9MHuman Services$326kPhilanthropy$48kYouth Development$40kEducation$15kHousing & Shelter$7kCommunity Improvement$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2018 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $97k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.8M
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cinco Charities$1,896,619
Amazing Place$500,000
Christ Clinic$381,000
Katy Cares$96,600
Fidelity Charitable$48,339
Big Brothers Big Sisters Greater Houston$20,000
Upbring$12,000
Covenant House of Texas$11,000
Clothed by Faith$11,000
Golden Circle Special Needs$10,000
Hope Impacts$7,150
KAEDC$2,900
The Church Global$1,200
Cinco Ranch Theatre Company Booster Club$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Covenant House of Texas: $22k → 16%Covenant House of Texas: $11k → 16%Clothed by Faith: $28k → 16%Clothed by Faith: $11k → 16%Hope Impacts: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 8 repeat orgs$540k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$2.7M
$19k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $521k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CINCO CHARITIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.9M · revenue +98%
  • CC
    Christ Clinic
    2× · 2017–2018 · $421k · revenue +54%
  • KC
    KATY CARES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $219k · revenue +13% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • PT
    Point the Way Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • KC
    Krause Children's Treatment Center
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
2
Katy Christian Ministries

See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…

Human Services
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Compassionate Care Medical Clinic

To serve the uninsured and underserved by providing free medical services with compassionate care.

Health
5
KatyCares Inc
Philanthropy
6
Hope Clinic Inc

To spread the love of christ to the community by providing quality healthcare and spiritual guidance. the clinic's mission is to provide free medical care and spiritual guidance that minister to the whole person. the clinic will provide…

Human Services
7
Christ's Hospital
—
8
Get Up Project

Hope clinic removes barriers to quality healthcare for medically underserved people to promote healthier families and communities. this clinic serves as a beacon of hope, providing free, compassionate, high- quality healthcare to those in…

International
9
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
10
San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic

Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…

—
11
Hope Clinic Inc

The Hope Clinic recognizes, educates and medically treats patients who are without resources as well as link those who qualify to established programs to meet their needs. By providing preventative care and routine health maintenance,…

Health
12
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Impacts; the most unlike its peers is Cinco Ranch Theatre Company Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CINCO CHARITIES INC: $1,933,862 · HealthCINCO CHARITIES INCChrist Clinic: $420,500 · HealthChrist ClinicAmazing Place: $500,000 · OtherAmazing PlaceBig Brothers Big Sisters Greater Houston: $40,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sis…UPBRING: $22,000 · Other+7 more: $33,300 · Other+7 moreKATY CARES INC: $218,574 · Food & NutritionCLOTHED BY FAITH INC: $39,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $33,000 · Human ServicesHOPE IMPACTS: $7,150 · Human ServicesFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $48,339 · Community ImprovementCINCO RANCH THEATRE COMPANY BOOSTER CLUB: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Health$2,354,362Other$595,300Food & Nutrition$218,574Human Services$79,150Community Improvement$48,339Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCINCO CHARITIES INC: $1,933,862 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetKATY CARES INC: $218,574 over 2y, 36% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $48,339 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLOTHED BY FAITH INC: $39,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $33,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CINCO CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ Clinic ↗
  • Who funds KATY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds CLOTHED BY FAITH INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IMPACTS ↗
  • Who funds CINCO RANCH THEATRE COMPANY BOOSTER CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ballard Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ballard Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ballard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph