Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Babinski Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$505kFood & Nutrition$1kRecreation & Sports$1kCommunity Improvement$1kEducation$700Public Safety & Disaster$20Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%MINNESOTA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%GAYLORD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20 → 8%CONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 11%LEECH LAKE LEGACY: $500k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION OF PEQUOT LAKES: $1k → 14%SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 9%GAYLORD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20 → 8%KIDS AGAINST HUNGER: $1k → 11%PEQUOT LAKES SCHOOL: $700 → 14%SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 9%GAYLORD FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSISTANCE: $20 → 8%SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 9%GAYLORD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20 → 8%SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lacrescent Animal Rescue Inc

Established in 2005, La Crescent Animal Rescue (LAR) is an all-volunteer, non-profit 501(c) 3 organization dedicated to the protection and welfare of animals in La Crescent, Minnesota. Our rescue shelter depends solely on the support and…

Animals
2
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
3
Lake County Animal Services Dba Orphan Dog Rescue

We provide emergency medical services, spays ands neuters for animals in need.

4
Siouxland Humane Society Inc

Provide services and programs that promote humane treatment of animals in the siouxland area. the organization operates a shelter, adopts animals to the public, promotes the spay/neuter of pets, provides educational programs and materials…

Animals
5
Lake County Humane Society

Animal shelter/pet adoptions

6
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
7
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
8
Rural Animal Rescue Effort

Animal rescue and temporary housing for dogs and cats while waiting for adoptions. The shelter provides rescue services, temporary housing, medical care, transporting and adoption services.

Animals
9
Humane Society of Lake County Inc

The Humane Society of Lake County is a non-profit corporation organized solely for charitable purposes and has the general responsibility to operate for the advancement of humane treatment and the prevention of cruelty to animals. Founded…

Animals
10
Northern Lakes Rescue

Northern Lakes Rescue aims to be the voice for we hear them through our hearts and give them a voice; for their eyes speak volumes. We aim to improve the lives of these animals in need by placing them in a loving foster home while getting…

Animals
11
Oneida County Humane Society

Promote humane treatment of companion animals and provide care and shelter while waiting to be rehomed

12
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sioux Falls Area Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Gaylord Fire Department Relief Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Leech Lake Legacy — $500,000 · AnimalsLeech Lake Legacy+3 more — $5,000 · AnimalsCONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,000 · OtherPEQUOT LAKES SCHOOL — $700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $60 · OtherOUTREACH PROGRAM OF BRAINERD LAKES — $1,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Action of Pequot Lakes — $1,000 · Community ImprovementGAYLORD FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION — $20 · Public Safety & Disaster
Animals$505,000Other$1,760Food & Nutrition$1,000Community Improvement$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$20

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH PROGRAM OF BRAINERD LAKES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGAYLORD FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Babinski Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Babinski Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Babinski Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph