Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arzak Foundation Ms Susan R Shapiro

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$212k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$4.1MReligion$242kHealth$236kEducation$191kPhilanthropy$145kHuman Services$110kEnvironment$90kInternational$59kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES OPERA$75,000
THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY$25,000
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS$25,000
TEMPLE AKIBA$14,200
NANTUCKET COMMUNITY SAILING$10,000
NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD$7,200
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$6,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,600
MAZON$4,500
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$3,500
ACLU FOUNDATION$3,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$3,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $1k → 8%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $1k → 8%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $500 → 8%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $500 → 8%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $500 → 8%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $400 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4k → 10%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $400 → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $200 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 10%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 10%ONE VOICE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 83 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

83 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
38

Total granted

$5.1M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+35%

Still filing today

55%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HE
    HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +99%
  • MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $176k · revenue +364%
  • BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $108k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • M
    MIT
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • PM
    PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Linda Loring Nature Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/72
Grantees still filing
58/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $2,868,018 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERYMASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $175,624 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $271,830 · Arts & Culture+11 moreLOS ANGELES OPERA: $525,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES OPERANANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $135,474 · OtherNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITALFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS: $135,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESSJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $103,800 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANG…TEMPLE AKIBA OF CULVER CITY: $95,535 · OtherTEMPLE AKIBA OF CULVER CITYPBS-SOCAL: $78,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD: $77,700 · Other+84 more: $550,819 · Other+84 moreInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc: $52,890 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationKENYON COLLEGE: $9,500 · EducationPROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM: $5,965 · EducationIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $900 · EducationNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $80,675 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $3,500 · Environment+2 more: $2,750 · EnvironmentAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $26,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND: $12,900 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,575 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $3,500 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $3,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $3,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $3,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $2,600 · InternationalCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $30,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $8,500 · PhilanthropyARRL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $1,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$3,315,472Other$1,701,328Education$89,255Environment$86,925International$61,575Philanthropy$43,000Community Improvement$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $2,868,018 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $175,624 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY: $107,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $80,675 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $76,980 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc: $52,890 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTON: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET COMMUNITY SAILING INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER: $14,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $12,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $10,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM: $5,965 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $3,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,575 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $2,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN MENDING HEARTS INC: $2,400 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARRL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WORLD WAR II INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTON ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET COMMUNITY SAILING INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA21.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Knox Foundation · King Spruce Company · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · Gilbert Verney Foundation · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arzak Foundation Ms Susan R Shapiro funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arzak Foundation Ms Susan R Shapiro. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Historical Society: 22% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Boston Lyric Opera Company: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Arzak Foundation Ms Susan R Shapiro?

Find your warmest path to The Arzak Foundation Ms Susan R Shapiro through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arzak Foundation Ms Susan R Shapiro’s filings →

More from the funding graph