Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arbor Rouge Foundation Trust Truxton Trust Co-Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$113kEnvironment$80kHuman Services$78kEducation$75kHousing & Shelter$60kYouth Development$60k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$843k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$7,500
MONROE HARDING$7,500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS$7,500
YOUTH VILLAGES$7,500
ONE ACRE FUND$7,500
CARTER CENTER$7,500
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$5,000
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$5,000
CONSERVATION FUND$5,000
HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $5k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $5k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES: $15k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
VA
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$458k · 12 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$458k
$8k

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +92%
  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +258%
  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
5
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Alliance for Sustainable Energy Llc

The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…

Science & Tech
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy

The minnesota center for environmental advocacy is a nonprofit organization that uses law, science and research to protect minnesota's environment, its natural resources and the health of its people.

Environment
11
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
12
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Harlem Children's Zone Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE ACRE FUND: $60,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $52,500 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCMONROE HARDING INC: $60,000 · OtherMONROE HARDING INCSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $15,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICASALVATION ARMY: $7,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $35,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FU…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFEN…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDAT…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES D…YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES IN…HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S…NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL ALLIA…NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationNASHVILLE PUBL…
International$112,500Other$82,500Environment$80,000Human Services$70,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Education$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $60,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $60,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMONROE HARDING INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $52,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE HARDING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arbor Rouge Foundation Trust Truxton Trust Co-Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arbor Rouge Foundation Trust Truxton Trust Co-Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arbor Rouge Foundation Trust Truxton Trust Co-Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph