Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Appleseeds Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$488k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$277k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of The Appleseeds Foundation’s FY2018 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
1
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$581kArts & Culture$30kSocial Science$15kEducation$14kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $277k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG AND ROCKINGHAM COUNTY$277,075
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG AND ROCKINGHAM COUNTY$200,000
SHENANDOAH VALLEY ECONOMIC EDUCATION$7,500
THOMAS HARRISON MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,500
TURNER ASHBY HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
STUARTS DRAFT MIDDLE SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY: $5k → 14%FRESH AIR FUND: $1k → 17%IAN TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: $5k → 14%BURNT ORANGES INC: $4k → 16%WILDLIFE CENTER OF VA: $1k → 8%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $8k → 11%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $99k → 22%WILSON MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $2k → 8%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $8k → 11%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%WILSON MEMORIAL HS: $1k → 8%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $1k → 11%STUARTS DRAFT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $500 → 8%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG AND ROCKINGHAM COUNTY: $277k → 11%STUARTS DRAFT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $500 → 8%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG AND ROCKINGHAM COUNTY: $200k → 11%BLUE RIDGE FOOD BANK: $10k → 8%FREE CLINIC: $10k → 11%BRCC ENACTUS: $5k → 8%FIRST STEP: $2k → 11%THOMAS HARRISON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $2k → 11%THOMAS HARRISON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $1k → 11%TURNER ASHBY HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 11%TURNER ASHBY HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 45% of The Appleseeds Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Appleseeds Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22k · 4 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$22k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
-11%

Still filing today

25%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YE
    YOUR ECONOMIC SUCCESS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +116%
  • TA
    TURNER ASHBY HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k
  • TH
    THOMAS HARRISON MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k

Funded once

  • HC
    HARRISONBURG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +24%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • FC
    FREE CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Via Art Fund Inc

Via art fund is a nonprofit organization where art patrons join forces as partners in a new model of philanthropy to support visionary initiatives in art.

Arts & Culture
2
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
3
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Greater Twin Cities

Our mission is to create and support mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
4
Florida Opportunity Fund Inc

The fund was created because the florida legislature found there was a need to increase the availability of seed capital and early stage venture equity capital for emerging companies in the state, including, without limitation, enterprises…

Community Improvement
5
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
6
The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. the james…

—
7
Baltimore Children and Youth Fund Inc

Baltimore children & youth fund stewards public funds to support children and youth in baltimore city. the fund awards grants to community-based, youth-serving organizations and provides capacity-building and technical assistance to…

Youth Development
8
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture

The american farm bureau foundation for agriculture strives to build awareness, understanding, and a positive perception of agriculture through education. the foundation offers a varierty of fun and engaging standards-based programs and…

—
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
11
Initiative for a Competitive Inner City Inc

Icic drives inclusive economic prosperity in under-resourced communities through innovative research and programs to create jobs, income, and wealth for local residents.

Housing & Shelter
12
An Open Book Foundation

An open book foundation (aob) connects washington, dc-area students with authors, illustrators, and their books to nurture a lifelong love of reading. we support educational justice by building equitable access to interactive literacy…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County; the most unlike its peers is Burnt Oranges Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG & ROCKINGHAM COUNTY: $477,075 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG & ROCKINGHAM COUNTYTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $104,226 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · OtherFREE CLINIC: $10,000 · OtherNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherTURNER ASHBY HIGH SCHOOL: $3,000 · OtherTHOMAS HARRISON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $2,500 · OtherFIRST STEP: $2,000 · OtherWILSON MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $1,500 · Other+5 more: $5,000 · OtherHARRISONBURG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,780 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBURNT ORANGES INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureYOUR ECONOMIC SUCCESS: $15,000 · Social SciencePACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRESH AIR FUND: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$581,301Other$44,000Arts & Culture$29,780Social Science$15,000Youth Development$5,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARRISONBURG & ROCKINGHAM COUNTY: $477,075 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $104,226 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARRISONBURG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,780 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYOUR ECONOMIC SUCCESS: $15,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURNT ORANGES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Appleseeds Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Appleseeds Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Appleseeds Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Appleseeds Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Appleseeds’ filings →

More from the funding graph