Skip to content
The Anthony J Blosenski Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Anthony J Blosenski Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$456k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of The Anthony J Blosenski Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Taylor University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What it funds
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $413k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAYLOR UNIVERSITY$210,000
CAPSTONE LEGACY FOUNDATION$100,000
HIGH POINT BAPTIST ACADEMY$52,500
HIGH POINT BAPTIST CHAPEL$50,000
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$20,000
MERCY MINISTRIES$8,000
READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
MORGANTOWN CARNIVAL CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP$2,500
CSB MINISTRIES INC$2,000
TWIN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
IBM GLOBAL$1,200
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUB$1,000
UNICO NATIONAL INC$900
THE CHESTER COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION$600
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$250
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $900) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNICO NATIONAL INC: $900 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
IN
PA
NJ
UT
CO
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
6
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
7
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
The Master's University and Seminary

The Master's University and Seminary (TMUS) exists to advance the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ through education. This is accomplished through unreserved commitment to worshipping God, authority of Scripture, personal holiness, serving…

Education
10
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
11
InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA

In response to God's love, grace, and truth, the purpose (mission) of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA is to establish and advance at colleges and universities witnessing communities of students and faculty who follow Jesus as Savior…

Religion
12
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Twin Valley Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Taylor University: $210,000 · EducationTaylor UniversityLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INCHIGH POINT BAPTIST ACADEMY: $52,500 · OtherHIGH POINT BAPTIST ACADEMYHIGH POINT BAPTIST CHAPEL: $50,000 · OtherHIGH POINT BAPTIST CHAPEL+6 more: $7,550 · Other+6 moreCapstone Legacy Foundation Inc: $100,000 · PhilanthropyCapstone Legacy Foundati…MERCY MINISTRIES PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,000 · HealthREADING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNICO NATIONAL INC: $900 · Human ServicesCompassion International Incorporated: $206 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $100 · International
Education$230,000Other$110,050Philanthropy$100,000Health$8,000Arts & Culture$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Human Services$900International$306

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTaylor University: $210,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCapstone Legacy Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY MINISTRIES PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetREADING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTWIN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNICO NATIONAL INC: $900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anthony J Blosenski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anthony J Blosenski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anthony J Blosenski Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home