Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Amyloidosis Foundation

The organizations mission is to increase education and awareness of amyloidosis, to assist patients in finding qualified medical care and to support research.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$620kEducation$313kScience & Tech$50k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $112,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $166,725 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $54,225 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL$75,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$37,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL: $75k → 8%BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $125k → 17%KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $20k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $200k → 21%JOHNS HOPKINS: $38k → 19%BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS: $25k → 19%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $38k → 17%HARVARD MEDICAL: $63k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $25k → 17%HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER (B&W): $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
MO
MD

Grants abroad, by region — $34k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Italy$12k · 36% · 4 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

Australia$6k · 18% · 2 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

North America (Canada and Mexico)$3k · 9% · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

Brazil$3k · 9% · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

Japan$3k · 9% · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

Spain$3k · 9% · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

Argentina$3k · 9% · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAVEL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$488k · 4 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$488k
$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CTRNYSNA RETIREE MEDIC AL PLAN TRUST
    4× · 2020–2024 · $288k · revenue +9% · 31% of their budget
  • HM
    HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $88k · revenue ×24
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $63k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +21%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
9
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University and the most unlike its peers is Harvard Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $62,500 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSY…NY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CTRNYSNA RETIREE MEDIC AL PLAN TRUST — $287,500 · Membership BenefitNY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL COLUMBIA…HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER — $87,500 · HealthHARVARD MEDICAL CENTERMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $50,000 · HealthMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCOR…MAYO CLINIC — $50,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICYALE UNIVERSITY ELIZABETHAN CLUB CORP — $25,000 · HealthYALE UNIVERSITY ELIZABETHA…BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $20,000 · HealthBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCE…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $75,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIG…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTO…MAYO CLINIC — $25,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC
Education$312,500Membership Benefit$287,500Health$232,500Other$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CTRNYSNA RETIREE MEDIC AL PLAN TRUST — $287,500 over 4y, 31% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $62,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Amyloidosis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Amyloidosis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Amyloidosis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph