Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Alliance for Community Transfusion Services LLC

To support its members and the independent, community blood banking model through shared resources, initiatves, and expertise.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$678k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192024.

Health$4.1MOther$734k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $606k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.9M
$103,192
Median grant
9
States reached
$685k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARTER BLOODCARE$677,785
OKLAHOMA BLOOD INSTITUTE DBA OUR BLOOD INSTITUTE$562,178
LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER$355,472
SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD AND TISSUE CENTER$282,313
COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER OF THE OZARKS$184,631
WE ARE BLOOD$120,083
BLOODWORKS NORTHWEST$103,192
SUNCOAST COMMUNITIES BLOOD BANK DBA SUNCOAST BLOOD CENTERS$80,176
COASTAL BEND BLOOD CENTER$66,011
BLOOD ASSURANCE INC$51,596
THE COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC$30,958
HOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK$30,958
MEDIC REGIONAL BLOOD CENTER$30,958
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTRA PENNSYLVANIA BLOOD BANK: $72k → 12%HOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK: $31k → 18%WE ARE BLOOD: $120k → 10%CARTER BLOODCARE: $678k → 11%SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD AND TISSUE CENTER: $282k → 16%COASTAL BEND BLOOD CENTER: $66k → 17%OKLAHOMA BLOOD INSTITUTE DBA OUR BLOOD INSTITUTE: $562k → 16%SUNCOAST BLOOD BANK: $64k → 9%SUNCOAST COMMUNITIES BLOOD BANK DBA SUNCOAST BLOOD CENTERS: $80k → 10%COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $185k → 15%THE COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC: $31k → 7%MEDIC REGIONAL BLOOD CENTER: $31k → 12%BLOOD ASSURANCE INC: $52k → 12%SHEPEARD COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER: $53k → 18%BLOODWORKS NORTHWEST: $103k → 9%LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER: $355k → 22%CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA BLOOD BANK: $9k → 12%HOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK: $172 → 18%WE ARE BLOOD: $95k → 10%CARTER BLOODCARE: $539k → 11%SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER: $224k → 16%COSTAL BEND BLOOD CENTER: $52k → 17%OKLAHOMA BLOOD INSTITUTE: $447k → 16%SUNCOAST BLOOD CENTERS: $8k → 10%COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $147k → 15%THE COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC: $25k → 7%SHEPEARD COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER: $7k → 18%LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER: $283k → 22%WE ARE BLOOD: $12k → 10%CARTER BLOODCARE: $69k → 11%SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER: $29k → 16%COSTAL BEND BLOOD CENTER: $7k → 17%OKLAHOMA BLOOD INSTITUTE: $57k → 16%COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $19k → 15%THE COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC: $3k → 7%LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER: $36k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
PA
CA
MO
TN
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 12 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$4.6M
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $186k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    Carter BloodCare
    3× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +35%
  • OB
    Oklahoma Blood Institute
    3× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +44%
  • LB
    LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER
    3× · 2019–2024 · $674k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • B
    BLOODWORKS
    one grant, 2024 · $103k · revenue +5%
  • BA
    BLOOD ASSURANCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $52k · revenue 0%
  • MI
    MEDIC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $31k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Blood Center Inc

At kentucky blood center, our mission is to ensure a safe and abundant supply of lifegiving blood to the hospitals we serve. we are here to support our local communities in any way that we are able by being an integral and valued partner…

Health
2
Western Kentucky Regional Blood Center Inc

To act as a regional blood bank

Health
3
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
4
Central Jersey Blood Center Inc

See schedule o for complete mission statement.cjbc was founded with a vision to save lives by providing safe, high quality blood products and services to patients in need. entrusted to collect, process and distribute this priceless life…

5
Blood Bank of Alaska Inc

The blood bank provides blood products and testing services to hospitals to ensure an adequate and safe supply of blood in routine and emergency situations. it provides educational services to potential donors and recipients of blood…

Health
6
Community Blood Center

The mission of CBC/CTS is to provide donors the opportunity to save and enhance lives through trusted community-based resources for transfusion and transplantation. CBC/CTS is dedicated to protecting the donation of blood and tissue from…

Health
7
Central California Blood Center

Central california blood center is committed to saving lives and improving patient care by providing a safe and abundant blood supply for the patients and families in the communities we serve.

Health
8
The Blood Center

The blood center is a non-profit, community service organization guided by a volunteer, independent 18-member board of directors, comprised of community leaders and hospital representatives. the staff is composed of over 200 professionals,…

Health
9
Lifesouth Community Blood Centers Inc

To provide a safe blood supply that meets or exceeds the needs of each community we serve, and to provide a variety of services in support of ongoing and emerging blood and transfusion-related activities.

Health
10
Dak-Minn Blood Bank

To provide and maintain a safe and adequate blood supply for altru health system and local health care facilities so that patients have available appropriate blood components.

11
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
12
Tacoma Pierce County Blood Bank Inc

To provide a constant, safe, cost-effective supply of blood, blood components and other related services to the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Blood Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Houchin Community Blood Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Carter BloodCare — $1,285,280 · HealthCarter BloodCareOklahoma Blood Institute — $1,066,055 · HealthOklahoma Blood InstituteSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER — $535,349 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTERCOMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER OF THE OZARKS — $350,116 · HealthCOMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER OF THE OZARKSWE ARE BLOOD — $227,712 · HealthWE ARE BLOODSUNCOAST COMMUNITIES BLOOD BANK INC DBA SUNCOAST BLOOD CENTERS — $152,038 · Health+7 more — $481,996 · Health+7 moreLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER — $674,080 · OtherLIFESHARE BLOOD C…WALTER L SHEPEARD COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC — $59,958 · OtherWALTER L SHEPEARD…
Health$4,098,546Other$734,038

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCarter BloodCare — $1,285,280 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOklahoma Blood Institute — $1,066,055 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER — $674,080 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER — $535,349 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER OF THE OZARKS — $350,116 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWE ARE BLOOD — $227,712 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUNCOAST COMMUNITIES BLOOD BANK INC DBA SUNCOAST BLOOD CENTERS — $152,038 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOASTAL BEND BLOOD CENTER — $125,177 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLOODWORKS — $103,192 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA BLOOD BANK — $81,239 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWALTER L SHEPEARD COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC — $59,958 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY BLOOD CENTER INC — $58,704 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD ASSURANCE INC — $51,596 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK — $31,130 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDIC INC — $30,958 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Scripps Research InstituteCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Scripps Research Institute · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alliance for Community Transfusion Services LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Oklahoma Blood Institute2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph