Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Alexander Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$131kEducation$103kAnimals$62kHuman Services$53kHousing & Shelter$49kInternational$40kEnvironment$15kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANNE'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH$10,000
HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE$10,000
JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
THE SMILE TRAIN$10,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE INC$10,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY$10,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$10,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE$5,000
AMANDA SCHULTZ SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
GRREAT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%ST ANNE'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH: $10k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $10k → 17%GLOBAL GIVING: $10k → 14%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE: $10k → 15%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10k → 9%HARSIMUS CEMETARY: $5k → 14%THE LIGHTHOUSE INC: $10k → 6%CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE: $5k → 7%JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE: $5k → 15%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10k → 9%HARSIMUS CEMETARY: $5k → 14%THE LIGHTHOUSE INC: $10k → 6%JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE: $5k → 15%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE INC: $10k → 6%JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE: $5k → 15%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE INC: $10k → 6%JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE: $5k → 15%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE INC: $10k → 6%JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE INC: $9k → 6%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%ST ANNE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 6%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SMILE TRAIN: $5k → 17%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%INDIAN CREEK SCHOOL: $20k → 6%INDIAN CREEK SCHOOL: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 14 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$527k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalAnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +50%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +31%
  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $59k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -40%
  • SA
    ST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
2
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
3
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
International Food Policy Research Institute

International food policy research institute's (ifpri) vision is a world free of hunger and malnutrition. ifpri's mission is to provide research-based policy solutions that sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition.

Food & Nutrition
6
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Institute of Food Technologists

As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…

—
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Light House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONJOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $57,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITALSMILE TRAIN INC: $46,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICE: $35,000 · OtherHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SERVICEST JUDE'S CHIDLREN'S RESEARCH: $27,500 · OtherST JUDE'S CHIDLREN'S RESEARCHAMANDA SCHULTZ SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $18,000 · OtherAMANDA SCHULTZ SCHOLARSHIP FUNDGRREAT: $13,000 · OtherST ANNE'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $14,950 · OtherTrustees of Tufts College: $62,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts C…INDIAN CREEK SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · EducationINDIAN CREEK SCHOOL…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $60,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIEND…THE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $58,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE LIGHT H…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalFAIRVOTE: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$291,450Education$97,000Animals$60,000Housing & Shelter$58,500Health$30,000Environment$15,000International$15,000Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $62,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $58,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $46,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN CREEK SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alexander Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alexander Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alexander’s filings →

More from the funding graph