Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Albright Foundation Inc The Stephanie Albright Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 97% of The Albright Foundation Inc The Stephanie Albright Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $2k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Therapeutic & Recreational Riding Center$53,300
Hopewell Fish and Game Association$1,000
Regent University$600
Living in Recovery$250
Charity Golf$200
Morgan Family Foundation$100
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$220k · 7 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$220k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+45%

Still filing today

43%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THERAPEUTIC & RECREATIONAL RIDING CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue -32%
  • HF
    HOPEWELL FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +75%
  • LI
    LIVING IN RECOVERY INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • MR
    MARRIOTT'S RIDGE BOOSTERS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • SD
    SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Margaret Clark Morgan Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Morgan Foundation Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Morgan Family Foundation
Human Services
4
Johnny Morgan Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
The Montgomery Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Margo Fowler Family Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Morgan Hoffmann Foundation

To lead the race to find a cure for muscular dystrophy through research and the establishment of health & wellness centers.

Health
8
Morgan Stanley Foundation
9
The Morizzo Foundation Inc

Raise awareness & funding for glioblasto

Arts & Culture
10
The Peter-Murray Foundation
Education
11
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
12
The Margaret Fitzgerald Grogan Petersmeyer Foundation Inc

The foundation provides grants to outstanding girls and young women from the institutions that featured most prominently in margaret fitzgerald grogan petersmeyer's life, including tenacre country day school, dana hall school, harvard…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asbury Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Morgan Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THERAPEUTIC & RECREATIONAL RIDING CENTER INC — $212,035 · OtherTHERAPEUTIC & RECREATIONAL RIDING CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $33,680 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+16 more — $7,535 · OtherHOPEWELL FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION — $3,500 · EnvironmentLIVING IN RECOVERY INC — $2,150 · HealthThe Claire Marie Foundation Inc — $850 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE MORGAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $250 · PhilanthropyMORGAN FAMILY FOUNDATION — $100 · PhilanthropyASBURY FOUNDATION INC — $80 · PhilanthropyJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $100 · Education
Other$253,250Environment$3,500Health$3,100Human Services$1,000Philanthropy$430Education$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHERAPEUTIC & RECREATIONAL RIDING CENTER INC — $212,035 over 7y, 18% of budgetHOPEWELL FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION — $3,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLIVING IN RECOVERY INC — $2,150 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Claire Marie Foundation Inc — $850 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREGENT UNIVERSITY — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOWARD COUNTY INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORGAN FAMILY FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR CHILDREN RESEARCH FOUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY FOUNDATION INC — $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THERAPEUTIC & RECREATIONAL RIDING CENTER INC
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds LIVING IN RECOVERY INC
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds The Claire Marie Foundation Inc
  • Who funds REGENT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOWARD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE MORGAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MORGAN FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HOPE FOR CHILDREN RESEARCH FOUND
  • Who funds ASBURY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Albright Foundation Inc The Stephanie Albright Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Albright Foundation Inc The Stephanie Albright Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Albright Foundation Inc The Stephanie Albright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph