Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

The Akridge-Peterson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$22,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$22,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 4
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$408k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The Akridge-Peterson Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
AnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$27k0%
FY20242$20k0%
FY20232$20k0%
FY20223$16k0%
FY20213$28k33%
FY20194$22k0%
FY20184$23k50%
FY20174$23kn/a
62% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$123kAnimals$6kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Great Peninsula Conservancy$122,50081%
Discovery Bay Wild Bird Rescue$3,00021%
Mid Puget Sound Fisheries Enhancement Gr$2,50020%
North Kitsap Trails Association$1,0001n/a

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($49k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Akridge-Peterson Foundation with peer funders

About The Akridge-Peterson Foundation

How much does The Akridge-Peterson Foundation give?
The Akridge-Peterson Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $27,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does The Akridge-Peterson Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (69%), Animals (3%), Recreation & Sports (2%).
Who are The Akridge-Peterson Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Great Peninsula Conservancy ($123k), Discovery Bay Wild Bird Rescue ($3k), Mid Puget Sound Fisheries Enhancement Gr ($3k).
Does The Akridge-Peterson Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Akridge-Peterson Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Akridge-Peterson Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Akridge-Peterson Foundation based?
The Akridge-Peterson Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Akridge-Peterson’s filings →

More from the funding graph