Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Aidlin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$3.5MHousing & Shelter$3.4MHealth$943kHuman Services$515kEducation$50k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
$140,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION RESCUE MISSION$140,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$140,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$140,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$140,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$140,000
MIDNIGHT MISSION$140,000
FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$140,000
WESTSIDE FOOD BANK$140,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER FOR WOMEN$80,000
HEART HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
HEME AQUI SENOR FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BLESSING IN A BACKPACK: $5k → 15%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $325k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $325k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $237k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $140k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $140k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $140k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $140k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $40k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $7k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER: $40k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER: $20k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER: $15k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $325k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $305k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $140k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $140k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $40k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $20k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $15k → 14%CHILDREN TODAY: $20k → 14%CHILDREN TODAY: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.4M · 15 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$8.4M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+59%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +205%
  • THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $985k · revenue +43%
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $938k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
St Francis Center

For the performance of charitable acts and service to the less fortunate.

4
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
5
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
6
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

7
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
8
Rescue Mission Alliance

The rescue mission alliance's primary purpose is to establish and operate rescue missions to reach the less fortunate with the gospel of jesus christ and to assist in the feeding, clothing, and lodging of those who are destitute or…

Human Services
9
Food On Foot

Food on foot is a nonprofit dedicated to assisting our unhoused and low-income neighbors in los angeles with nutritious meals, clothing, and a fresh start through life-skills training, full-time employment, and permanent housing.

Human Services
10
Urban Angels Co Scott Lutwak

Urban angels is designed to nourish and provide food for the homeless and hungry of san dieo, ca. urban angels provides feeding services every wednesday in collboration with the salvation army and is the primary food provider for residents…

11
Laguna Food Pantry

Provide free groceries to individuals and families in need.

12
Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano

The food bank of contra costa and solano (food bank) was incorporated on july 28, 1975. the food bank was established in order to efficiently gather, warehouse, and distribute food products to contra costa county charities meeting…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Regional Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Foodbank of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $985,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSIONUNION RESCUE MISSION — $902,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSIONDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $612,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER+3 more — $120,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $1,017,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD …GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER FOR WOMEN — $360,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CENTER FOR W…ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS — $342,000 · OtherST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELSSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY — $177,000 · OtherSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD …+3 more — $95,000 · OtherFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,083,000 · Food & NutritionFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIF…WESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $867,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK+1 more — $5,000 · Food & NutritionVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $938,000 · HealthVENICE FAMIL…LOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $897,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES …BRIDGE TO HOME SCV — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$2,619,000Other$1,991,000Food & Nutrition$1,955,000Health$938,000Housing & Shelter$897,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,083,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $1,017,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $985,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $938,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $902,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $897,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $867,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $612,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY — $177,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChildren Today Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBRIDGE TO HOME SCV — $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FINDERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER
  • Who funds SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC
  • Who funds Children Today Inc
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO HOME SCV
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Aidlin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph