Skip to content
The Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$5.0MReligion$769kInternational$291kHealth$257kEducation$110kArts & Culture$109kHuman Services$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $3,100,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,225,813 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $125,813 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$3,100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$75M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEARTBEET LIFESHARING: $1k → 12%OUR PLACE NY: $5k → 17%CHEVRA GMACH: $10k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $22k → 20%KIMPOTURIN AID: $25k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $12k → 20%PROJECT LEGACY: $13k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%MISASKIM: $4k → 20%MISASKIM: $200 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
NJ
RI
CA
NE
MD
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 18 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +160% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
86

Total granted

$21M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+160%
+41%

Still filing today

33%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $291k · revenue +227%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $125k · revenue +51%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $43k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HATIKVAH INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY CHARTER
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • MY
    MIKVAH YISROEL OF FLATBUSH
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +383%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Smach Zevilin of Ny Inc

To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.

Philanthropy
5
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
6
Chevra Ahavas Chesed Inc

Assistance in religious burials

Membership Benefit
7
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
8
Hatzolah Tosh Inc

Providing financial assistance to emergency organizations as well as other charitable, educational, and religious organizations worldwide.

Philanthropy
9
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
10
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
11
Ezreinu Inc
Health
12
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hatzolah Emergency Air Response Team Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alaris Health Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $15,520,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROSPECT PARK GMACH FUND: $4,955,000 · OtherPROSPECT PARK GMACH FUND+86 more: $1,273,907 · Other+86 moreTOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC: $291,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $125,000 · InternationalBonei Olam Inc: $43,452 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $25,136 · Human ServicesPROJECT LEGACY: $12,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $3,700 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureALARIS HEALTH FOUNDATIONINC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $35,000 · Food & NutritionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $19,400 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $360 · Health
Other$21,748,907International$416,000Human Services$100,788Arts & Culture$75,000Philanthropy$50,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Health$34,760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC: $291,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALARIS HEALTH FOUNDATIONINC: $50,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $43,452 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $25,136 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $19,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT LEGACY: $12,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetME'OHR BAIS YAAKOV INC: $10,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH ORE SEMINARY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHATZOLOH EMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $3,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVa'ad Ha'eruv of Rockland: $1,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEARTBEET LIFESHARING CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEANINGFUL MINUTE INC: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALARIS HEALTH FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds KIMPATORIN AID INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds ME'OHR BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundAllen I Gross Charita…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Lchayim Foundation IncPartners in Giving IncDeutsch Family Founda…Yisroel Aryeh and Lei…Terumah Foundation IncJsw FoundationChavie Stern Family F…The Jmg Foundation
The Ojc FundNY35.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Lchayim Foundation Inc · Partners in Giving Inc · Deutsch Family Foundation · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · Terumah Foundation Inc · Jsw Foundation · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Heartbeet Lifesharing Corporation: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ahava Foundation F/K/A the Eisenreich Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home