Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Afr Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$151kHuman Services$96kEducation$44kInternational$42kPhilanthropy$18kHealth$9kCivil Rights$8kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDA SCHOOL$7,500
AL EKHLAS TRANING ACADMY$5,000
MIFFTAH$4,000
AL-FURQAAN FOUNDATION$3,000
AL RAHMA$3,000
UNITY CENTER$3,000
IRUSA$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ISNA$1,000
ZAYTUNA COLLAGE$1,000
PUR HAND$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELPING HAND: $10k → 8%HELPING HAND: $2k → 8%HELPING HAND: $330 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
NJ
CA
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$351k · 23 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
16

Total granted

$351k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+14%

Still filing today

26%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
EducationInternationalReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TQ
    THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +158%
  • TZ
    THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    2× · 2019–2022 · $14k · revenue +256%
  • PH
    PURE HANDS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • S
    SWASIA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • JI
    JAMIA ISLAMIA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
3
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
4
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
5
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
6
Al-Zaharah Islamic Education Center
—
7
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
8
The Human Development Foundation of North America

To facilitate a Non-Political Movement for Positive Social Change and Community Empowerment through Mass Literacy, Enhanced Quality of Education,Universal Primary Healthcare and Grassroots Economic Development.

International
9
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
10
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
11
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
12
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Zakat Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Huda School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAYYAN CENTER: $80,000 · OtherRAYYAN CENTERTHE MUSLIM UNITY CENTER: $29,636 · OtherTHE MUSLIM UNITY CENTERUNITY CENTER: $26,296 · OtherUNITY CENTERQURAN INSTITUTE: $23,490 · OtherQURAN INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $22,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSWASIA: $20,000 · OtherAL EKHLAS TRANING ACADMY: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $13,515 · Other+25 more: $130,825 · Other+25 moreTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $27,500 · EducationTHE QURAN…HUDA SCHOOL: $11,500 · EducationHUDA SCHO…PURE HANDS INC: $12,500 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $4,150 · InternationalHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $12,330 · Human ServicesAL-FURQAAN FOUNDATION: $3,000 · ReligionZaytuna College Inc: $2,000 · Religion
Other$375,962Education$39,000International$16,650Human Services$12,330Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $27,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $13,515 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $12,330 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUDA SCHOOL: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $4,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZaytuna College Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AL RAHMA INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds AL-FURQAAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fountain of Knowledg FoundationMI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · The Syed Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Afr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Afr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Afr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Afr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Afr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph