Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Afognak Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$2.1MArts & Culture$1.6MFood & Nutrition$1.0MEducation$685kHuman Services$520kAnimals$513kHealth$375kHousing & Shelter$300kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $801k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.2M
$30,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Seacology$132,575
Blessings in a Backpack$125,000
Yellowstone Forever$125,000
Remote Area Medical$105,000
World Wildlife Fund Inc$100,000
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc$100,000
NourishMKE Inc$85,000
Climb$60,000
Acts Community Development Corp (dba Acts Housing)$60,000
Room To Read$50,000
Community Musicworks$50,000
Reach Out and Read Inc$50,000
Buzzards Bay Coalition Inc$50,000
Little Traverse Conservancy$50,000
Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA of Greater Boston: $45k → 16%YMCA of Greater Boston: $20k → 16%YMCA of Greater Boston: $20k → 16%Innocence Project: $20k → 17%Innocence Project: $20k → 17%United Methodist Children's Services of Wisconsin Inc: $10k → 17%Innocence Project: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
IN
CT
RI
CA
VA
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 73 repeat orgs$840k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -76% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
27

Total granted

$7.7M
$700k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-76%

Still filing today

58%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $325k · revenue +189% · 30% of their budget
  • RA
    REMOTE AREA MEDICAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $315k · revenue +69%
  • YF
    YELLOWSTONE FOREVER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $310k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • AC
    ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • FC
    FRIEDENS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • BY
    BOSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY ORECHESTRA
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
2
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
3
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
7
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
8
The Maritime Aquarium At Norwalk Inc

The maritime aquarium at norwalk seeks to ignite a connection to long island sound and the ocean to enrich the lives of all people and inspire action to protect our blue planet.

Arts & Culture
9
Minnesota Orchestral Association

The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
10
Wisconsin Conservatory of Music Inc

Inspiring individuals and communities through exceptional music education, accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
11
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Boston Landmarks Orchestra Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Antonio Philharmonic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
30/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEACOLOGY: $397,725 · OtherSEACOLOGYGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $250,000 · OtherNational Audubon Society: $235,000 · OtherSEACOLOGY: $220,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $200,000 · Other+71 more: $3,887,347 · Other+71 moreYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $310,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE …WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $300,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLI…Little Traverse Conservancy Inc: $150,000 · EnvironmentLittle Trave…BUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $150,000 · EnvironmentBUZZARDS BAY…+2 more: $25,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY MUSICWORKS: $150,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY M…BOSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON YOUT…CENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTSINC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR …RADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureRADIO MILWA…Jackson Hole Public Art: $75,000 · Arts & CultureJackson Hol…MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $70,425 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE R…SHELBURNE MUSEUM INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureSHELBURNE M…THE BOSTON LANDMARKS ORCHESTRA INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOSTON …SAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $40,000 · Arts & CultureROOM TO READ: $150,000 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INC: $150,000 · EducationBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $120,000 · EducationEX FABULA INC: $32,500 · EducationREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $315,000 · InternationalTAILORED FOR EDUCATION INC: $90,000 · InternationalTHE SHARING FOUNDATION: $45,000 · InternationalBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentWATUPPA ROWING CENTER INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $170,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $60,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$5,190,072Environment$935,000Arts & Culture$835,425Education$452,500International$450,000Youth Development$350,000Human Services$325,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEACOLOGY: $397,725 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $325,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $315,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $310,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $170,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetROOM TO READ: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSICWORKS: $150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNourishMKE Inc: $145,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC: $135,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTSINC: $120,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKINSHIP MKE INC: $120,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $120,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $120,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTAILORED FOR EDUCATION INC: $90,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJackson Hole Public Art: $75,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $70,425 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLAN A HEALTH INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSHELBURNE MUSEUM INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOSTON LANDMARKS ORCHESTRA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF PATHWAYS: $60,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE SHARING FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBirthday Wishes Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetALL HANDS BOATWORKS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetEX FABULA INC: $32,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCHATFIELD BRASS BAND INC: $31,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWATUPPA ROWING CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSOUTHERN AROOSTOOK AGRICULTURE MUSEUM: $15,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSARA M HOLBROOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGROUNDWORK MILWAUKEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEACOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSICWORKS ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NourishMKE Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTSINC ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP MKE INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TAILORED FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds RADIO MILWAUKEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI26.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Weiss Family Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Youth Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Afognak Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Afognak Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • The Immigrant Learning Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Shelburne Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Boston Landmarks Orchestra Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Neighborhood Developers Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Afognak Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Afognak Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Afognak’s filings →

More from the funding graph