Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Adib Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$766kHuman Services$13kHealth$4kCommunity Improvement$4kFood & Nutrition$3kEducation$3kInternational$1kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $145k
$30,153
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INCANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INC$145,257
DAWAT-E-HADIYAH AMERICA$30,153
LAUNCHGOOD$2,836
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $2k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
KY
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$780k · 5 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$780k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+6%

Still filing today

20%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    ANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INCANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $624k
  • DA
    DAWAT-E-HADIYAH AMERICA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $141k
  • NO
    No One Left Behind
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • T
    TCFUSA
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SS
    SHUKRE-ILAHI SCHOLARSHIP FUND CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR RURAL ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
6
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
7
Debbie's Dream Foundation

Debbie's dream foundation:curing stomach cancer is dedicated to raising awareness about stomach cancer, providing education, advocacy, and support internationally to patients, families, and caregivers affected by the disease, and advancing…

Human Services
8
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
9
Genomic Data Initiative
Science & Tech
10
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Direct Relief; the most unlike its peers is Shukre-Ilahi Scholarship Fund Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INCANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INC: $624,214 · OtherANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INCANJUMAN-E-BADRI NY INCDAWAT-E-HADIYAH AMERICA: $141,477 · OtherDAWAT-E-HADIYAH AMERICA+17 more: $20,739 · OtherNo One Left Behind: $10,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,163 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $500 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF: $1,024 · InternationalAmerican Diabetes Association: $500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $100 · HealthSahiyo US Inc: $500 · Civil RightsNETWORK FOR GOOD: $268 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$786,430Human Services$12,663International$1,024Health$600Civil Rights$500Public Safety & Disaster$268

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNo One Left Behind: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,163 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,024 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $268 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
  • Who funds SHUKRE-ILAHI SCHOLARSHIP FUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sahiyo US Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Adib Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Adib Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adib’s filings →

    More from the funding graph