Skip to content

· Private foundation

The 6-18 Foundation for Hope

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$425kEducation$421kYouth Development$290kReligion$95kCommunity Improvement$75kHuman Services$30kHealth$20k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCI FOUNDATION$125,316
GIVEWELL$25,000
SAMUELI ACADEMY - ORANGEWOOD FOUNDA$20,000
WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$20,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$20,000
CCEF$10,000
GIVEDIRECTLY$10,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $20k → 7%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $25k → 22%SAMUELI ACADEMY: $20k → 10%GIVEWELL: $50k → 10%TEAM RUBICON: $10k → 14%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $20k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDER: $20k → 17%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 9%MAP INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10k → 7%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10k → 22%SAMUELI ACADEMY - ORANGEWOOD FOUNDA: $20k → 10%GIVEWELL: $25k → 10%TEAM RUBICON: $10k → 14%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $20k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 9%MAP INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10k → 7%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10k → 22%SAMUELI ACADEMY - ORANGEWOOD FOUNDA: $20k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $20k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 9%MAP INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10k → 7%UCI FOUNDATION: $125k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $20k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%UCI FOUNDATION: $102k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $20k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%UCI FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $20k → 10%UCI FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $20k → 10%ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATIONSAMUELI ACADEMY: $50k → 10%CEO LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE - OC: $25k → 10%SAMUELI ACADEMY: $50k → 10%CEO LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE - OC: $25k → 10%SAMUELI ACADEMY: $50k → 10%CEO LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE - OC: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 17 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$1.5M
$70k

Still filing today

76%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $427k · revenue +3%
  • SA
    SAMUELI ACADEMY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $120k · revenue +67%
  • WT
    WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • OF
    ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATIONSAMUELI ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • DW
    DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDER
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
5
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
6
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
7
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
8
The German Marshall Fund of the United States

The german marshall fund of the united states (gmf) strives to champion democratic values and the transatlantic alliance by strengthening civil society, forging bold and innovative policy ideas, and developing a new generation of leaders…

International
9
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
10
Amnesty International of the Usa Inc

Amnesty international of the usa, inc. is the united states section of amnesty international - a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights. (continued on schedule o).organization's mission…

International
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Against Malaria Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $426,648 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATIO…SAMUELI ACADEMY: $120,000 · EducationSAMUELI ACADEMYSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIO…WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $115,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMIN…UC BERKELEY: $100,000 · OtherUC BERKELEYCEO LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE - OC: $75,000 · OtherCEO LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE - OCORANGEWOOD FOUNDATIONSAMUELI ACADEMY: $50,000 · OtherORANGEWOOD FOUNDATIONSAMUELI …SAMUELI ACADEMY - ORANGEWOOD FOUNDA: $40,000 · OtherSAMUELI ACADEMY - ORANGEWOOD …DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDER: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $95,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $90,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONT…MAP International Inc: $50,000 · InternationalMAP International I…Save The Children Federation Inc: $40,000 · InternationalSave The Children F…The Against Malaria Foundation: $110,000 · HealthORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CLEAR FUND: $75,000 · PhilanthropyGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC: $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$586,648Other$420,000International$275,000Health$110,000Crime & Legal$100,000Philanthropy$75,000Human Services$30,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $426,648 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMUELI ACADEMY: $120,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $115,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $110,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $95,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMUELI ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 6-18 Foundation for Hope funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 6-18 Foundation for Hope. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 6-18 Foundation for Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph