Skip to content
The 5801 Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The 5801 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$110kCivil Rights$52kReligion$50kFood & Nutrition$34kCrime & Legal$21kHuman Services$15kEducation$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$584k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$50,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTE$15,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTE: $15k → 17%CHILDREN NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $60k → 11%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $5k → 18%BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 8%LITTLE FORK VOLUNTEER FIRE AND RESCUE: $3k → 8%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $50k → 8%VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $3k → 9%A WIDER CIRCLE: $5k → 8%CHILDREN NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50k → 11%BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 8%SERVICES TO ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $11k → 8%VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $3k → 9%A WIDER CIRCLE: $5k → 8%MY SISTER'S PLACE: $5k → 14%BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 8%SERVICES TO ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $5k → 8%MY SISTER'S PLACE: $5k → 14%SERVICES TO ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $5k → 8%MY SISTER'S PLACE: $5k → 14%SOME (SO OTHERS MAY EAT): $5k → 14%SOME (SO OTHERS MAY EAT): $5k → 14%SOME (SO OTHERS MAY EAT): $5k → 14%SOME (SO OTHERS MAY EAT): $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 10 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$237k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+7%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsInternationalCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +28%
  • ST
    Services to Abused Families Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $21k · revenue +4%
  • MS
    MY SISTER'S PLACE INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $15k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • LF
    LITTLE FORK VOLUNTEER FIRE AND
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
2
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

—
3
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
4
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
5
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
6
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
7
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
11
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
12
New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault Inc

The alliance leads new york citys mission to end sexual violence through education, prevention programming, research, and policy change. until we end sexual violence in all forms, we will be here for all survivors and the organizations…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Poverty Law Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Fork Volunteer Fire and. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAELServices to Abused Families Inc: $21,000 · OtherServices to Abused Families IncSOME (SO OTHERS MAY EAT): $19,000 · OtherSOME (SO OTHERS MAY EAT)MY SISTER'S PLACE INC: $15,000 · OtherMY SISTER'S PLACE INCBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $5,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $110,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $26,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $15,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH…A WIDER CIRCLE INC: $10,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $10,000 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLITTLE FORK VOLUNTEER FIRE AND: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$125,500International$110,000Civil Rights$41,000Education$10,000Health$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000Youth Development$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetServices to Abused Families Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMY SISTER'S PLACE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE FORK VOLUNTEER FIRE AND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 5801 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 5801 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 5801’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home