Skip to content

· Public charity

Texas Southern University Foundatio

The foundation's purpose is to aid in the advancement of texas southern university's objectives and purposes, especially in the areas of research capabilities, supporting community engagements, and students scholarships.

$6.3M
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Education$10.0MEnvironment$297kCommunity Improvement$256kCrime & Legal$102kCivil Rights$40kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $3,542,635, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,269,898 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,727,263 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.2M
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$3,166,122
CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY$51,175
SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT$44,000
NORTHEAST HOUSTON REDEVELOPMENT COU$44,000
COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$44,000
COMMUNITY IN-POWER & DEVELOPMENT A$40,000
ORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & DEM$40,000
ACHIEVING COMMUNITY TASKS SUCCESSFU$40,000
TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCAC$40,000
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY NATIONAL$13,338
CITIZENS FOR CLEAN AIR AND WATER$10,000
PI GAMMA GAMMA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHEAST HOUSTON REDEVELOPMENT COU: $44k → 16%BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER: $8k → 16%TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY NATIONAL: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 5 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +169% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$10M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+169%
+54%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $249k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationEnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $247k · revenue +55%
  • AC
    Achieving Community Task Successfully
    2× · 2022–2023 · $69k · revenue +173%
  • CO
    COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $52k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • JS
    JUSTICE SYSTEM PARTNERS
    one grant, 2022 · $92k · revenue +23%
  • NL
    NATIONAL LEGAL AID AND DEFENDER ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +54%
  • HB
    HONEY BROWN HOPE FOUNDATION-FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CULTURAL ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Partnership

The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…

Civil Rights
2
Neighbors for Environmental Justice

The mission of Neighbors for Environmental Justice is to foster awareness, organize and promote community action on environmental justice to achieve environmental health and just transition by preventing and reducing pollution and building…

Environment
3
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc

Environmental Justice & Equality

Education
4
The Global Action Research Center

Facilitate local communities and institutions in developing, sharing and scaling up sustainabilitity solutions-- locally and globally--to eradicate root causes of poverty, environmental degradation and unhealthy living conditions. Our…

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Housing & Empowerment Connection Inc
Housing & Shelter
6
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Community Organization for Resource Equity
—
8
Sowing Justice

The mission of Sowing Justice is to utilize Environmental Justice principles to increase civic engagement with organizing tools and resources for healthy and safe communities. We connect communities with resources and tools that empower…

Environment
9
Collaborative Earth Institute

We are scientists and engineers, humanists and designers. Coming together across disciplinary and cultural boundaries, we form focused teams to discover and co-create pathways to social and ecological regeneration.

Science & Tech
10
Charleston Community Research to Action Board

Charleston Community Research to Action Board (CCRAB) promotes safe, healthy, and just neighborhoods within environmental justice communities in the Lowcountry through community-led research and citizen science. CCRAB's core tenets are…

Health
11
New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance

New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance, Inc. Is an alliance of New Jersey Organizations and Individuals committed to creating healthy, sustainable and just communities by eliminating environmental injustices in low income and…

Environment
12
Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice

Greenaction mobilizes community power to win victories that change govenment and corporate policies and practices to protect health and promote environmental, economic and social justice.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Deep South Center for Environmental; the most unlike its peers is Sunnyside Community Redevelopment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $9,894,746 · OtherTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY+3 more: $57,950 · OtherDEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL: $247,190 · EnvironmentTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY: $40,000 · EnvironmentAchieving Community Task Successfully: $68,500 · EducationClaremont Graduate University: $51,175 · EducationSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT: $44,000 · EducationCITIZENS FOR CLEAN AIR AND WATER IN BRAZORIA COUNTY: $10,000 · EducationPI GAMMA GAMMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationJUSTICE SYSTEM PARTNERS: $91,719 · Civil RightsORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY: $40,000 · Civil RightsNortheast Houston Redevelopment Council: $51,500 · Human ServicesTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIV NATL ALUMNI ASSN INC: $13,338 · Human ServicesCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $51,950 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL LEGAL AID AND DEFENDER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$9,952,696Environment$287,190Education$183,675Civil Rights$131,719Human Services$64,838Community Improvement$51,950Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL: $247,190 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJUSTICE SYSTEM PARTNERS: $91,719 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAchieving Community Task Successfully: $68,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $51,950 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetNortheast Houston Redevelopment Council: $51,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $51,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT: $44,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY: $40,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY: $40,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIV NATL ALUMNI ASSN INC: $13,338 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AID AND DEFENDER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPI GAMMA GAMMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Windward FundDC19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Windward Fund · Houston Endowment Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · Tides Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texas Southern University Foundatio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texas Southern University Foundatio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Justice System Partners: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Texas Southern University Foundatio?

Find your warmest path to Texas Southern University Foundatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Texas Southern University Foundatio’s filings →

More from the funding graph