Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Texas Association of Realtors Housing Opportunity Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$171k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
COMAL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
AMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
CINDY RAMSEY CENTER$7,500
AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DENTON COUNTY INC$5,000
HISPANIC REAL ESTATE$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VETCARES INC: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$133k · 6 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$133k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+43%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +43%
  • AH
    AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • HO
    Help Out Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • NH
    NESTQUEST HOUSTON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +65%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY URBANISM
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -47%
  • VI
    VetCares Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love in action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

2
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

4
Habitat for Humanity Texas Inc

Habitat offices across texas rely on habitat for humanity texas to strenghten efforts to address the affordable housing crisis that face communities across the state. habitat texas does this by empowering and equiping these offices through…

Housing & Shelter
5
Habitat for Humanity of Effingham County Inc

Habitat is a christian housing ministry that works with people in need to improve the conditions in which they live by providing affordable housing.

6
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity of Worcester County Inc

To build and rehabilitate houses which are sold to low-income families through no-interest loans

8
Habitat for Humanity International Chemung County

Chemung county habitat is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access…

9
Habitat for Humanity- Northeast Michigan Inc

To provide adequate affordable housing for those in need. two built homes were sold in the fiscal year.

10
Habitat for Humanity of Central Arkansas Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
11
Habitat for Humanity of Northern Arizona

Faith based housing ministry, bringing all faiths together to work in partnership with those in need, building decent homes in decent neighborhoods.

12
Habitat for Humanity the Wind River Country

The organization builds homes for low income families.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amarillo Habitat for Humanity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stephenville Association of Realtor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTY — $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTYFRAMEWORKS COMMUNITY — $30,000 · OtherFRAMEWORKS COMMUNITYCENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY URBANISM — $20,000 · OtherCENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY URBANISMAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $15,000 · OtherAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCTRINITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $10,000 · OtherTRINITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DENTON COUNTY INC — $5,000 · OtherSTEPHENVILLE ASSOCIATION OF REALTOR — $5,000 · Other+4 more — $7,000 · OtherNESTQUEST HOUSTON INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterNESTQUEST HOUSTON INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN …HISPANIC REAL ESTATE BROKERS — $10,500 · Housing & ShelterHISPANIC REAL ESTATE BROKERSAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I…Help Out Center Inc — $12,500 · Food & NutritionVetCares Inc — $6,000 · Human Services
Other$137,000Housing & Shelter$60,500Food & Nutrition$12,500Human Services$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTY — $45,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNESTQUEST HOUSTON INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY URBANISM — $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHelp Out Center Inc — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC REAL ESTATE BROKERS — $10,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVetCares Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DENTON COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHENVILLE ASSOCIATION OF REALTOR — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetARLINGTON BOARD OF REALTORS INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Association of Realtors Housing Opportunity Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph