Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tersigni Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.3M
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$6.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$6.2MReligion$1.0MHealth$565kEducation$355kInternational$125kAnimals$100kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.2M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUND$6,228,799
AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY$25,000
EDMUND T AHEE ENDOWMENT FUND$4,000
CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST: $100k → 8%ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $100k → 10%CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $1k → 21%ASCENSION MINISTRY AND MISSION FUND: $25k → 11%SLU MEDICAL SCHOOL: $100k → 21%GLOBAL SOLIDARITY FUND: $100k → 9%NATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON: $250k → 6%MORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $6.2M → 8%ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%EDMUND T AHEE ENDOWMENT FUND: $4k → 21%ASCENSION MINISTRY AND MISSION FUND: $500k → 11%AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY: $25k → 21%NATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON: $250k → 6%AUSTIN CATHOLIC HS: $2k → 10%NAZARETH LIVING CENTER FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY: $10k → 21%NATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON: $250k → 6%AUSTIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 10%AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY: $1k → 21%NATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON: $250k → 6%AUSTIN CATHOLIC HS: $975 → 10%ST LOUIS ZOO: $100k → 21%AUSTIN CATHOLIC HS: $500 → 10%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $25k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 5 repeat orgs$6.7M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$1.7M
$492k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-60%
+18%

Still filing today

20%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.0M
  • AM
    Ascension Ministry & Mission Fund
    2× · 2017–2020 · $525k · revenue -60%
  • SM
    ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $125k

Funded once

  • GS
    Global Solidarity Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -98%
  • SM
    SLU MEDICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS ZOO
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $6,228,799 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUNDNATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON: $1,000,000 · OtherNATIONAL SHRINE OF ST ELIZABETH ANN SETONAscension Ministry & Mission Fund: $525,000 · OtherAscension Ministry & Mission Fund+10 more: $510,575 · Other+10 moreGlobal Solidarity Fund: $100,000 · InternationalST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationLA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,264,374International$100,000Education$25,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAscension Ministry & Mission Fund: $525,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetGlobal Solidarity Fund: $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ascension Ministry & Mission Fund ↗
  • Who funds Global Solidarity Fund ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tersigni Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tersigni Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tersigni Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph