Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tenth Amendment Project Inc

The tenth amendment project is dedicated to the notion that the tenth amendment to the united states constitution was enacted to expressly limit the powers delineated to the federal government and to reserve the rest to state governments, who understand the needs of their constituencies best.

$215k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Community Improvement$4.8MPublic Benefit$235kEmployment$225kEducation$75kCivil Rights$15k
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JOBS COALITION$200,000
NEXT POLICIES LLC$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%BETTER JOBS STRONGER FAMILIES POLICY SOLUTIONS: $25k → 9%SOLDIER STRONG ACCESS: $25k → 9%ILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION: $4.8M → 11%THE JOBS COALITION: $200k → 14%CITIZEN OUTREACH INC: $35k → 13%CONSERVATIVE ACTION NETWORK: $85k → 10%CITIZEN OUTREACH INC: $30k → 13%CONSERVATIOVE POLICY FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
State Policy Institute

To promote pro-growth, progressive policy at the state level.

2
Conservative Policy Council Fund

To advance policies that promote limited government, support economic growth and business, and seek strong international relationships that enhance American national security and trade objectives.

3
Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies Inc

To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.

Education
4
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
5
Senate Opportunity Fund

Advance Conservative Solutions Through Research And Communication On Public Policy Issues.

6
21st Century Policy Institute

21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.

7
Rocky Mountain Policy Group

Promoting a strong state economy with limited government taxes and regulation.

8
Stronger America Inc

Stronger America is dedicated to promoting good government and advancing issues that encourage American exceptionalism and strength by educating people on the importance of limited government fiscal conservatism and family values.

9
Jobs for Texas

Jobs for Texas (JFT) brings together all sectors of the Texas business and economic development community under one umbrella to undertake legislative initiatives that require a coordinated statewide effort. Unlike other industry, trade,…

Community Improvement
10
Securing American Greatness Inc

The organization engaged in paid public advertising to espouse its positions on border security, crime, national defense, economic and tax issues. the organization also made grants to mission-aligned organizations.

11
United Conservative Policy Fund

Promote conservative policies in the USA.

12
Better Government Association Inc

The better government association, inc. (the organization") works to fight waste, corruption, and inefficiency in government, in illinois by using investigative journalism techniques, litigation, and public policy studies to expose…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Illinois Coalition for Jobs Growth and Prosperity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION — $4,800,000 · OtherILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION+3 more — $65,000 · OtherILLINOIS COALITION FOR JOBS GROWTH AND PROSPERITY — $200,000 · Community ImprovementSOLDIER STRONG ACCESS — $25,000 · Community ImprovementSAVING TEXAS — $85,000 · Civil RightsCitizen Outreach Inc — $65,000 · Civil RightsCONSERVATIVE POLICY FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationSTATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,865,000Community Improvement$225,000Civil Rights$150,000Education$75,000Public Benefit$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVING TEXAS — $85,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetCONSERVATIVE POLICY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetCitizen Outreach Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetSTATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBETTER JOBS STRONGER FAMILIES POLICY SOLUTIONS — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tenth Amendment Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tenth Amendment Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tenth Amendment Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph