Skip to content

· Public charity

Tennesseans for Quality Early Education Policy and Research

To advance state policies and practices that ensure all tennessee children birth through 3rd grade get the high quality early education they need to power our state's future.

$250k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Education$831kPhilanthropy$400kHealth$150kCommunity Improvement$150k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE$50,000
CHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION$50,000
BALLAD HEALTH$50,000
UNITED WAY OF WEST TN$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $50k → 12%CHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TN: $50k → 14%TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCA: $315k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $50k → 12%CHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TN: $50k → 14%TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCA: $179k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $50k → 12%CHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCA: $169k → 17%TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCA: $119k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 6 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$1.5M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $781k · revenue +61% · 75% of their budget
  • CC
    CHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $150k · revenue +80%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WEST TENNESSEINC STARKS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $150k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • Vanderbilt University
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION: $781,370 · EducationTENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATIONVanderbilt University: $50,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityCHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyCHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO…UNITED WAY OF WEST TENNESSEINC STARKS: $150,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WEST TENNESSEIN…UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSE…UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLEINC: $150,000 · OtherUNITED WAY …Ballad Health: $150,000 · HealthBallad Heal…
Education$831,370Philanthropy$400,000Other$150,000Health$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION: $781,370 over 4y, 75% of budgetCHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLEINC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST TENNESSEINC STARKS: $150,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBallad Health: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Truist Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Truist Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tennesseans for Quality Early Education Policy and Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tennesseans for Quality Early Education Policy and Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tennesseans for Quality Early Education Policy and Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph