Skip to content
Ten County Aging Board Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Ten County Aging Board Inc

Provide services for the elderly

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$9.6MHuman Services$4.5MHealth$1.2MCrime & Legal$147kHousing & Shelter$13k
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $2,517,002, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,853,568 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,336,566 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $297k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $556k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$25,430
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGING PROJECTS INC$1,627,154
WINDSOR PLACE$193,079
RENO COUNTY DEPARTMENT ON AGING$87,687
RICE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$79,810
KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$76,164
SUMNER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$60,953
RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING$57,985
COMMUNITY CARE CONNECTIONS$48,922
HARPER COUNTY DEPARTMENT ON AGING$42,289
RENO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$34,292
COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$31,346
MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$25,430
MCPHERSON MEALS ON WHEELS$20,480
HARPER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARMENT$18,565
CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$17,834
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $62k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $58k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $101k → 12%GREENWOOD COUNTY BOARD FOR SENIOR: $4k → 15%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $38k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $55k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $76k → 12%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $30k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $39k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $65k → 12%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $27k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $28k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $65k → 12%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $25k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $23k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $62k → 12%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $25k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $18k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $61k → 12%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $23k → 10%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $10k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $60k → 12%SUMNER BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $55k → 13%RESOURCE CTR FOR IND LIVING: $7k → 11%KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $60k → 12%MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $22k → 10%SUMNER COUNTY BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $48k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $51k → 16%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $51k → 16%SUMNER BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $28k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $48k → 16%SUMNER COUNTY BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $28k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $38k → 16%SUMNER COUNTY BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $14k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $31k → 16%SUMNER COUNTY BOARD FOR SENIOR SERV: $11k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $31k → 16%SUMNER COUNTY BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $9k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $26k → 16%SUMNER BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $9k → 13%COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $24k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 26 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$15M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AGING PROJECTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.4M · revenue +32% · 43% of their budget
  • RC
    RICE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $553k · revenue +75%
  • KC
    KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $550k · revenue +32% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • SK
    Southwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +37%
  • SJ
    ST JAMES CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kershaw County Council On Aging

Providing services for the elderly in kershaw county.

Human Services
2
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
3
East Central Kansas Area Agency On Aging

Provide services and meals to the elderly and disabled

—
4
Osage County Council On Aging Inc

To provide elderly residents of osage county, kansas with such services as they may from time to time require or find desirable and which, because of their age, they cannot provide themselves and which ought to be provided as economically…

Human Services
5
Kosciusko County Council On Aging and Aged Inc

To provide services and resources to the aged citizens of kosciusko county indiana and surrounding areas including transportation, mobile meals, and senior activities to improve quality of life

—
6
Sanders Co Council On Aging

To provide for the special needs of elderly people in sanders county and to provide transportation for the county.

Human Services
7
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
8
Seward County Council On Aging Inc

None

Human Services
9
Dillon County Council On Aging

Provides senior center and congregate and home delivered meals, homemaker services allowing seniors to remain in their homes.

Human Services
10
Council On Aging & Human Services

Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.

Human Services
11
Midland Area Agency On Aging

The mission of midland area agency on aging is to provide caring and quality services to older adults and their families that enable independent living with dignity in their homes and communities.

Human Services
12
Papans Landing Senior Center Inc

Recreational, transportation, visitation services

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elk County Council On Aging Inc; the most unlike its peers is Home Technology Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGING PROJECTS INC: $9,409,982 · Food & NutritionAGING PROJECTS INC+1 more: $162,831 · Food & NutritionWINDSOR PLACE: $940,676 · OtherWINDSOR PLACERICE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $552,854 · OtherRICE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING I…SUMNER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $477,190 · OtherSUMNER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN…RENO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $412,638 · OtherRENO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTReno County Public Transport: $313,159 · OtherReno County Public TransportCOUNTY OF HARPER: $265,930 · OtherCOUNTY OF HARPERELK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $216,455 · OtherCOMMUNITY CARE CONNECTIONS: $198,069 · OtherKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $147,018 · Other+11 more: $645,075 · Other+11 moreKINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $550,013 · Human ServicesKINGMAN COU…COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $298,985 · Human ServicesCOWLEY COUN…MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $252,718 · Human ServicesMCPHERSON C…RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $237,590 · Human ServicesRESOURCE CE…SUMNER BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $201,933 · Human ServicesSUMNER BOAR…+1 more: $3,835 · Human ServicesFOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $80,095 · HealthPLEASANT VIEW HOME: $44,185 · HealthHOME TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC: $14,004 · Health
Food & Nutrition$9,572,813Other$4,169,064Human Services$1,545,074Health$138,284

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGING PROJECTS INC: $9,409,982 over 8y, 43% of budgetRICE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $552,854 over 8y, 17% of budgetKINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $550,013 over 8y, 26% of budgetCOWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $298,985 over 8y, 12% of budgetMCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $252,718 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $237,590 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetELK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $216,455 over 8y, 20% of budgetSUMNER BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $201,933 over 8y, 31% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF MCPHERSON KS INC: $162,831 over 8y, 20% of budgetKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $147,018 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $80,095 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLEASANT VIEW HOME: $44,185 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSouthwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Inc: $34,178 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOME TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC: $14,004 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGING PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds RICE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGMAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds COWLEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds ELK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMNER BOARD FOR SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF MCPHERSON KS INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANT VIEW HOME ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOME TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ten County Aging Board Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ten County Aging Board Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ten County Aging Board’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home