Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Team for West Virginia Children

To promote child well-being, thereby preventing child abuse and neglect.

$543k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.4MCrime & Legal$245kHealth$152kCommunity Improvement$88kEmployment$80kHousing & Shelter$45kCivil Rights$30kPhilanthropy$19k
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 43 grants below total $518,792 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $543,286 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,494 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $218k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $301k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEP BY STEP INC$40,000
MINERAL COUNTY FRN$32,500
OHIO COUNTY FRN$32,500
TUCKER COUNTY FRN$32,500
NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION$30,000
MORGAN CO PARTNERSHIP$25,000
EASTERN REGIONAL FRN$22,500
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV$21,292
TAYLOR COUNTY FRN$15,000
MASON COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK$10,000
CLAY CO FRN$10,000
THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$10,000
BROOKE HANCOCK FRN$10,000
DODDRIDGE COUNTY FRN$10,000
WIRT COUNTY FRN$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $858k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%BROOKE HANCOCK FRN: $10k → 12%PRESTON COUNTY CARING COUNCIL: $8k → 14%OHIO COUNTY FRN: $33k → 15%MONROE CO COALITION: $8k → 15%MINERAL COUNTY FRN: $33k → 16%LEWIS COUNTY FRN: $8k → 18%NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION: $30k → 18%CORNERSTONE FAMILY INTERVENTION: $8k → 19%MASON COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $10k → 19%RITCHIE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 20%DODDRIDGE COUNTY FRN: $10k → 20%WETZEL COUNTY CENTER FOR C&F INC: $11k → 21%CHILDLAW SERVICES INC: $8k → 21%CALHOUN FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 22%REACHH-FRC: $9k → 23%GILMER COUNTY FAMLY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 23%BROOKE HANCOCK FRN: $9k → 12%PRESTON COUNTY CARING COUNCIL: $8k → 14%OHIO COUNTY FRN: $33k → 15%MONROE CO COALITION: $8k → 15%MINERAL COUNTY FRN: $33k → 16%LEWIS COUNTY FRN: $8k → 18%NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION: $30k → 18%MASON COUNTY FRN: $9k → 19%RITCHIE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 20%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $10k → 21%CHILDLAW SERVICES INC: $8k → 21%CALHOUN FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 22%REACHH-FRC: $8k → 23%GILMER COUNTY FAMLY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 23%PRESTON COUNTY CARING COUNCIL: $8k → 14%MINERAL COUNTY FRN: $33k → 16%NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION: $30k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $40k → 18%NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION: $30k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $40k → 18%NICHOLAS CO EMPOWERMENT CORPO: $19k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $15k → 18%NICHOLAS CO EMPOWERMENT CORPO: $15k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $15k → 18%NICHOLAS CO EMPOWERMENT CORPO: $15k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $14k → 18%NICHOLAS CO EMPOWERMENT CORPO: $15k → 18%NICHOLAS CO EMPOWERMENT CORPO: $15k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $10k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $10k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $10k → 18%STEP BY STEP INC: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 43 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
3

Total granted

$2.1M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+121%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $199k · revenue +10%
  • ER
    EASTERN REGIONAL FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +305%
  • SB
    STEP BY STEP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $164k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • DC
    DODDRIDGE CO FAMILY RESOURCEgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +121%
  • WC
    WIRT COUNTY FRN CITIZENS HELPING CITIZENS INC
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FAMILY INTERVENTIONS INC
    one grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tyler County Family Resource Network Inc

To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote

Human Services
2
Nicholas County Family Resource Network Inc

Family and child services

Human Services
3
Family Counseling Connection Inc

Nurturing the mental health and psychological well being of children, adults and families.

—
4
Virginia Child Care Resource and Referral Network

Contracts with child care resource agencies to provide assistance to working parents in locating and identifying child care programs and to collect, maintain, and disseminate

—
5
Central Child Care of Wv

Supervision of child care providers

Human Services
6
River Valley Child Development Services Services Inc

To provide quality services and support to children, families, and the early childhood community

Human Services
7
Child & Family Resource Council Inc

The prevention of child abuse and neglect through strengthening families.

—
8
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
9
Doddridge County Starting Point Center Inc

We provide programs and services that support and strengthen Doddridge County families through interagency coordination and collaboration. These will be available, easily accessible, and located with in the county.

Human Services
10
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
11
Family Network Inc

To meet the needs of families in northwest arkansas for individualized parenting education and family support.

Crime & Legal
12
West Virginia Healthy Kids and Families Coalition

Work to improve the health of children and families in west virginia through leadership. to provide a forum for diverse organizations to discuss, coordinate and collaborate on issues that improve the health and well-being of west virginia…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reachh Family Resource Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Childs Place Casa Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr11%0%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr14%62%20–35yr14%11%35–55yr20%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%13%<5yr11%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr14%60%20–35yr14%8%35–55yr20%7%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
11%
1,158/10,893

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
26/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORP — $199,000 · Human ServicesNICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORPSTEP BY STEP INC — $164,000 · Human ServicesSTEP BY STEP INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $123,792 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INCMINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200 — $105,000 · Human ServicesMINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $80,000 · Human ServicesOHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORKWetzel County Center for Children and Families Inc — $43,750 · Human Services+12 more — $266,000 · Human Services+12 moreREGIONAL FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $124,500 · OtherREGIONAL FAMILY RESOURCE N…TUCKER COUNTY FRN — $56,000 · OtherTUCKER COUNTY FRNPLEASANTS CO COMMITTEE ON FAMILY ISSUES — $37,000 · OtherPLEASANTS CO COMMITTEE ON …HARRISON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASKFORCE IN C — $30,000 · OtherHARRISON COUNTY CHILD ABUS…POWER HOUSE YOUTH CENTER — $30,000 · OtherPOWER HOUSE YOUTH CENTERBRAXTON HEALTHY FAMHEALTHY CHILDREN COAL — $30,000 · OtherBRAXTON HEALTHY FAMHEALTHY…FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK OF ROANE COUNTY WV INC — $21,500 · OtherCLAY CO FRN — $17,500 · OtherEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $30,000 · OtherEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMM…Child Development Center of Central WV Inc — $30,000 · OtherChild Development Center o…A CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD — $30,000 · OtherA CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD+4 more — $53,000 · Other+4 moreEASTERN REGIONAL FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $165,000 · HealthEASTERN REGI…SHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I — $38,700 · HealthSHENANDOAH V…WILLIAMSON HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC — $30,000 · HealthWILLIAMSON H…MORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $50,000 · Crime & LegalMORGAN CO…Taylor County Collaborative Family Resource Network Inc — $45,000 · Crime & LegalTaylor Co…STOP THE HURT INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalSTOP THE …JUST FOR KIDS INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalJUST FOR …CASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalCASA FOR …Marion County Family Resource Network — $31,000 · Community ImprovementPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $30,000 · Community ImprovementRandolph County Family Resource Network Inc — $26,500 · Community ImprovementTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION — $80,000 · EmploymentUNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNITES INC — $50,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$981,542Other$489,500Health$233,700Crime & Legal$185,000Community Improvement$87,500Employment$80,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORP — $199,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetEASTERN REGIONAL FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $165,000 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetSTEP BY STEP INC — $164,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetREGIONAL FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $124,500 over 8y, 13% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $123,792 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200 — $105,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetOHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $80,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION — $80,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNITES INC — $50,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTaylor County Collaborative Family Resource Network Inc — $45,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetWetzel County Center for Children and Families Inc — $43,750 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I — $38,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREACHH FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $31,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMarion County Family Resource Network — $31,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $30,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetChild Development Center of Central WV Inc — $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHARRISON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASKFORCE IN C — $30,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSTOP THE HURT INC — $30,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDLAW SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWILLIAMSON HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONROE COALITION FOR CHILDREN & FAM — $30,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetGILMER CO FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $30,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetA CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD — $30,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetJUST FOR KIDS INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPRESTON COUNTY CARING COUNCIL INC — $30,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $30,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetRITCHIE COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $30,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetRandolph County Family Resource Network Inc — $26,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetBROOKE HANCOCK FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $18,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCABELL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $15,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetCALHOUN COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY INTERVENTIONS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard McDonough Fou…Pallottine Foundation…Firstenergy FoundationSave The Children Fed…The Greater Kanawha V…West Virginia Child A…The Antero FoundationWest Virginia Univers…West Virginia First F…Community Foundation …Parkersburg Area Comm…Dominion Energy Chari…
Bernard McDonough Foundation IncWV19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Firstenergy Foundation · Save The Children Federation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · West Virginia Child Abuse Network Inc · The Antero Foundation · West Virginia University Research Corporation · West Virginia First Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Team for West Virginia Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines