Skip to content

South Dakota · Public charity

Tanka Fund

To return buffalo to Native American lands, lives, and economies.

$275k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$97k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$66,958
Organizations funded a year
3 to 3
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$744k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations Tanka Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 67% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$97k25%
FY20233$75k67%
FY20203$15kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$92kEnvironment$45kCommunity Improvement$40kHuman Services$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hochoka Kin Holdings LLC$66,9581n/a
Knife Chief Buffalo Nation Society$40,000550%
Native Wise LLC$35,0002n/a
One Spirit$35,00042%
Ekvnv Yefolecvlke$5,00010%
Rosebud Economic Development Corporation$5,0001n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Ndn Collective Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Tanka Fund with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tanka Fund?

Find your warmest path to Tanka Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Tanka Fund

How much does Tanka Fund give?
Tanka Fund reported 4 itemized grants totaling $96,958, out of $275,458 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 3 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Tanka Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (49%), Environment (24%), Community Improvement (21%).
Who are Tanka Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Hochoka Kin Holdings LLC ($67k), Knife Chief Buffalo Nation Society ($40k), Native Wise LLC ($35k).
Does Tanka Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Tanka Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include First Nations Development Institute, Ndn Collective Inc, Common Counsel Foundation.
Where is Tanka Fund based?
Tanka Fund is based in SD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tanka’s filings →

More from the funding graph