Skip to content

· Private foundation

T Nash and Gloria M Broaddus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$195kEducation$89kPublic Safety & Disaster$68kArts & Culture$63kHealth$12kEnvironment$8kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANCHOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$13,500
FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC CHRISTS CHURCH$10,000
MCV FOUNDATION$7,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$7,500
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION$7,500
THE SALVATION ARMY (CENTRAL VIRGINIA AREA COMMAND)$7,500
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$7,500
RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION$7,500
RIVER COUNTIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
BAY AGING$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $8k → 14%BAY AGING: $10k → 12%BAY AGING: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 11 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$368k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ANCHOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +14%
  • UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +6%
  • FF
    Foundation for Historic Christ Church Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • CO
    CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • US
    UNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uso Foundation

The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.

—
2
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
3
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
6
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
7
Marine Corps Association Foundation

To provide resources and support to sustain and expand programs and activities essential to the marine corps association's (mca) mission by engaging everyone inspired by the marine corps.

Arts & Culture
8
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Veterans Navigation Network

Transition for service members.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Historic Christ Church Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $60,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTRAVIS MANION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTRAVIS MANION FOUNDATIONUNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $12,500 · OtherUNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATIONOPERATION WARD 57: $11,100 · OtherOPERATION WARD 57RIVER COUNTIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherRIVER COUNTIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…THE SALVATION ARMY (CENTRAL VIRGINIA AREA COMMAND): $7,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY (CENTRAL VIRGI…Individual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRICHMOND FISHER HOUSE AND FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherANCHOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $81,000 · EducationANCHOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUND…MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FO…RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationRAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER…UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $57,500 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGA…CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public BenefitCARING FOR MILITARY…Foundation for Historic Christ Church Inc: $55,000 · Arts & CultureFoundation for H…COALITION TO SALUTE AMERICA'S HEROES FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCOALITION TO SAL…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…BAY AGING: $15,000 · Human ServicesBAY AGINGCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Environment
Other$131,600Education$96,000Public Benefit$77,500Arts & Culture$63,000Human Services$50,000Crime & Legal$15,000Environment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANCHOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $81,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $57,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Historic Christ Church Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBAY AGING: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION WARD 57: $11,100 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCOALITION TO SALUTE AMERICA'S HEROES FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANCHOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Historic Christ Church Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AGING ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION WARD 57 ↗
  • Who funds COALITION TO SALUTE AMERICA'S HEROES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T Nash and Gloria M Broaddus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T Nash and Gloria M Broaddus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on T Nash and Gloria M Broaddus’ filings →

More from the funding graph