Skip to content

· Private foundation

T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$186k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$186k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$1.3MEducation$430kFood & Nutrition$203kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$186,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAICES$186,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $346k → 14%FOOD STUDIES INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%CHILIS ON WHEELS: $5k → 17%THE PLANTRICIAN PROJECT: $2k → 11%RAICES: $186k → 11%PLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC: $225k → 13%TRANSPLANTING TRADITIONS COMMUNITY FARM: $5k → 13%MAROON ARTS GROUP: $5k → 15%HEALTHCARE CHOICES NY INC: $5k → 10%HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $300k → 14%PLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC: $205k → 13%HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $300k → 14%Highland Hospital of Rochester: $300k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies
Philanthropy
2
Planted Society

We partner with brands restaurants and communities to inspire plant-based eating everywhere by providing free assistance including marketing PR and consultation.

Environment
3
People for Better Food

To shift society towards plant rich diets

Food & Nutrition
4
Food and Planet

The mission of Food & Planet is to empower nutrition professionals to advance sustainable food systems through our programs and resources. Over the past year, we have engaged with partners to develop several key resources and learning…

Food & Nutrition
5
Rethink Your Food Inc

Rethink Your Food advocates for the benefits of a plant-based diet and plant-focused food system as key solutions to advancing nutrition security, and mitigating environmental concerns and animal suffering. We collaborate with Caribbean…

Food & Nutrition
6
Sustainable Growers
—
7
Plant Docs Inc

To educate people and medical professionals on the importance of diet and health, how whole food plant-based nutrition can prevent, improve and reverse many chronic diseases including obesity, type-2 diabetes, and cardiac-related disease.…

Education
8
Seed Peace

To grow the local food supply by supporting farmers, preparing food plants for climate change and increasing health giving food availability for people in need

—
9
Planetary Health Inc

To offer education on diet, health, and the environment and contribute to world peace

Environment
10
Preventive Medicine Research Institute

Preventive Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in scientific research investigating the effects of diet and lifestyle choices on health and disease. Our work is grounded in compassion and dedication to service. PMRI achieves its…

Health
11
Agricultural Health Benefits Alliance Educational Foundation Llc
Education
12
Plant-Based Life Foundation

The mission of the Plant-Based Foundation is to educate and empower people to live happier and healthier lives through positive habitat change and the adoption of plant-based nutrition.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plantpure Communities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Maroon Arts Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $1,245,837 · HealthHIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTERPLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC: $430,000 · EducationPLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC+1 more: $5,000 · EducationRAICES: $186,000 · OtherRAICES+3 more: $10,500 · Other+3 moreTransplanting Traditions Community Farm: $5,000 · Food & NutritionPlant-based Prevention Of Disease Inc: $2,062 · Food & NutritionMAROON ARTS GROUP: $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe Plantrician Project: $1,500 · Science & Tech
Health$1,245,837Education$435,000Other$196,500Food & Nutrition$7,062Arts & Culture$5,000Science & Tech$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $1,245,837 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC: $430,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetTransplanting Traditions Community Farm: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAROON ARTS GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPlant-based Prevention Of Disease Inc: $2,062 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Plantrician Project: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGroundswell Center for Local Food and Farming Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies?

    Find your warmest path to T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph