· Private foundation
T&N Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EZER MIZION | $15,000 |
| Yeshiva Tal Chaim | $8,040 |
| Friends of Zichron Kelem of Jerusal | $6,750 |
| Keren Mugein Imoisheya | $6,000 |
| YESHIVA DEGEL HATORAH INC | $5,000 |
| VARIOUS CHARITIES 1800 AND UNDER | $3,960 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| Beit Medrash Gvoha L'Torah V'Halach | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +119% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
27 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BVBikur Vezrat Cholim Inc5× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +119%
- CLCHAI LIFELINE INC2× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +58%
- CFCentral Fund of Israel4× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- SSIFRIYAone grant, 2020 · $30k
- MTMinyan Tzeiirim Dati Leumione grant, 2022 · $15k
- KCKEREN CHASDEI MOSHEone grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assistance to establish a community in ramat beit shemesh, israel, founded upon torah principles, prayer, justice, charity and kindness to all peoples. to encourage and promote jewish religious activities.
Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.
religious and educational program for post high school youth
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To support the charitable activities of the organization ezrat achim in the city of beit shemesh, israel.
American Friends of Kulo Zakai Inc provides support to Jewish educational institutions that further religious observance, Torah study, and education in Israel and the US, in order to strengthen the continuity of the Jewish People.
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization T&N Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T&N Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on T&N’s filings →