Skip to content

· Private foundation

Swasey Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$141kHuman Services$52kFood & Nutrition$28kHealth$20kEmployment$11kHousing & Shelter$9kYouth Development$7kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Our Neighbors' Table$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Pettengill House$3,500
Anna Jaques Hospital$3,000
Nourishing the Northshore$2,500
Opportunity Works Inc$2,000
Housing Support Inc$1,000
North of Boston Cancer Resource Cen$500
Central Congregational Church$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Pettengill House: $7k → 10%Pettengill House: $5k → 10%Pettengill House: $4k → 10%Pettengill House: $3k → 10%Community Service of Newburyport: $3k → 10%Our Neighbors' Table: $10k → 10%Our Neighbors Table: $4k → 10%Our Neighbors' Table: $3k → 10%Our Neighbors' Table: $3k → 10%Our Neighbors' Table: $2k → 10%Our Neighbors' Table: $2k → 10%Northern Essex Elder Transport Inc: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117k · 13 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
39

Total granted

$117k
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+42%

Still filing today

38%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEmploymentEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    Our Neighbors' Table Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +22%
  • TP
    The Pettengill House Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +19%
  • AJ
    ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
2
Northeast Independent Living Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services to people with all disabilities who wish to live independently in the community.

—
3
New England Resident Service Coordinators Inc

Resident Service Coordinators are professionals who serve elders, youth and families in their housing communities. NERSC provides training & professional development, including on-line courses for Resident Service Coordinators and housing…

Housing & Shelter
4
Eastern Area Agency on Aging

It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options, and services for seniors, adults with disabilities, and caregivers.

Human Services
5
Northeast Kingdom Council on Aging Inc

We support people age 60 and older persons with disabilities in their efforts to remain active healthy, financially secure, and in control of their own lives. The Agency connects people and the services they they need to live independently…

Human Services
6
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
7
Nantucket Community Service Inc

Provide low income elderly housing.

—
8
The Shared Living Collaborative Inc

To provide services and residential support to individuals with disabilities

Human Services
9
Lenox Hill Neighborhood House Inc

Lenox Hill Neighborhood House is dedicated to helping those in need who live, work, or go to school on Manhattan's East Side, primarily the Upper East Side, and to improving the quality of life for all individuals and families in its…

Human Services
10
Boston Neighborhood Support Inc
Housing & Shelter
11
Merrimack Valley Housing Partnership Inc

To promote responsible and sustainable home ownership opportunities for low and moderate income earners by producing comprehensive training and counseling, as well as promoting the use of special mortgage products and down payment…

Housing & Shelter
12
The Well Ne

The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Service of Newburyport Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northern Essex Elder Transport Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $13,500 · OtherYWCASalvation Army: $8,300 · OtherBoys and girls Club: $7,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · Other+42 more: $161,250 · Other+42 moreOur Neighbors' Table Inc: $22,800 · Human ServicesOur Neighbors' Ta…The Pettengill House Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesThe Pettengill Ho…Community Service of Newburyport Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesCommunity Service…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL INC: $14,377 · HealthOpportunity Works Inc: $11,300 · EmploymentAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $5,000 · EducationNourishing the North Shore Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Action Inc: $1,000 · Community ImprovementHousing Support Inc: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$197,300Human Services$44,300Health$14,377Employment$11,300Education$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Community Improvement$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOur Neighbors' Table Inc: $22,800 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Pettengill House Inc: $18,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL INC: $14,377 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOpportunity Works Inc: $11,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNourishing the North Shore Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Service of Newburyport Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES MA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNorthern Essex Elder Transport Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Our Neighbors' Table Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Pettengill House Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Opportunity Works Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Nourishing the North Shore Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Service of Newburyport Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation IncMA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · Newburyport Society for the Relief of Aged Women Inc · Mary Alice Arakelian Foundation · The Provident Community Charitable Organization Inc · Newburyport Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · NAID Foundation · George C Wadleigh Foundation Inc · Edward S & Winifred G Moseley Foundation · George P Bishop Foundation Inc · The Frank L Currier Charitable Foundation · Leeward Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Swasey Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Swasey Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Opportunity Works Inc: 77% of income from government
  • Community Action Inc: 52% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Nourishing the North Shore Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Northern Essex Elder Transport Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 8% of income from government
  • Our Neighbors' Table Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Anna Jaques Hospital Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swasey Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Swasey Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swasey’s filings →

More from the funding graph