Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Leeward Charitable Foundation Inc

The organization operates a charitable thrift store in massachusetts to recycle, reuse, and renew for charity in order to achieve their goal.

$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Food & Nutrition$297kYouth Development$65kCommunity Improvement$35kHuman Services$32k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $60,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $88,299 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,299 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION OF HAVERHILL$15,000
THE PETTENGILL HOUSE INC$15,000
OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE$15,000
THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $223k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Seabrook Community Action Food Pantry: $8k → 5%York Community Action Inc: $16k → 9%York Community Action Inc: $10k → 9%York Community Action Inc: $10k → 9%The Pettengill House Inc: $25k → 10%The Pettengill House Inc: $20k → 10%The Pettengill House Inc: $10k → 10%The Pettengill House Inc: $10k → 10%The Pettengill House Inc: $10k → 10%Community Services of Newburyport: $7k → 10%Our Neighbors Table: $25k → 10%THE PETTENGILL HOUSE INC: $15k → 10%OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE: $15k → 10%OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE: $12k → 10%Our Neighbors Table: $10k → 10%Our Neighbors Table: $10k → 10%Our Neighbors Table: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$388k · 7 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$388k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+71%

Still filing today

86%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Pettengill House Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $90k · revenue +105%
  • Community Action Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $85k · revenue +60%
  • ON
    Our Neighbors' Table Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $82k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • FM
    FUEL & MOREgraduated
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +71%
  • FI
    Footprints Inc Footprints Food Pantrygraduated
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +445%
  • SS
    STONE SOUP FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emergency Food Aid in Southbury

Providing food assistance to Southbury residents demonstrating need.

2
Jamestown Community Food Pantry

We seek to minimize hunger and provide nutritional sustenanc

Food & Nutrition
3
Burlington-Hampshire Area Food Pantry

Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
4
Heart of Putnam Food Pantry Inc Sharing Putnams Bounty

Providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
5
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Joans Pantry

Joans Pantry provides free food to those in need in our community We receive food from USDA and the NH Food Bank and also purchase food to supplement what we get for free

Food & Nutrition
7
Heart of Maine Resource Center

Heart of Maine Resource Center was founded in 2018 to bridge persistan gaps in access to food and supportive services for neighbors in the greater Dexter ME area. Transending the current community barrie

Food & Nutrition
8
Bowdoinham Food Pantry

This is a food pantry serving residents of Bowdoin and Bowdoinham Maine. Each week we serve 49 - 66 households including weekly food provided through a weekend food for kids program serving 25 to 35 children and their families each week.…

Food & Nutrition
9
Community Action of Southern Kentucky Inc

We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.

10
Harvest House

Food Security

Human Services
11
Wellsboro Area Food Pantry

Provode food for families in need.

Food & Nutrition
12
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern New Hampshire Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saco Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Pettengill House Inc — $90,000 · Human ServicesThe Pettengill House IncOur Neighbors' Table Inc — $82,000 · Human ServicesOur Neighbors' Table IncYORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION — $36,000 · Human ServicesYORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATIONSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC — $8,000 · Human Services+1 more — $7,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Action Inc — $85,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity Action IncBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY INC — $64,502 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CL…York Community Food Pantry — $15,000 · OtherFootprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry — $8,000 · OtherSTONE SOUP FOOD PANTRY — $8,000 · OtherSACO FOOD PANTRY — $15,000 · Food & NutritionFUEL & MORE — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$223,000Community Improvement$85,000Youth Development$64,502Other$31,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Pettengill House Inc — $90,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Action Inc — $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOur Neighbors' Table Inc — $82,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY INC — $64,502 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetYORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION — $36,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSACO FOOD PANTRY — $15,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFootprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry — $8,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Service of Newburyport Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward S & Winifred G Moseley FoundationMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward S & Winifred G Moseley Foundation · Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Newburyport Society for the Relief of Aged Women Inc · Swasey Fund Inc · Mary Alice Arakelian Foundation · George P Bishop Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leeward Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 52%
  • Community Action Inc52% of income from government
  • Our Neighbors' Table Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leeward Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leeward Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph