Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Svanee's Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$5.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $169k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $678k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY$1,025,000
Individual grant recipient$125,300
SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE$125,000
PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$107,500
OLD DOG HAVEN$100,000
PASADOS SAFE HAVEN$100,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA$70,000
MUSTLUVBOXERS RESCUE$50,000
KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY$40,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF US$35,000
CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE$28,525
CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NW$20,000
SEATTLE AREA FELINE RESCUE$20,000
PAWSITIVE ALLIANCE$15,000
ASPCA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ASPCA: $10k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF US: $150k → 14%SARVEY WILDLIFE: $125k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA: $70k → 9%CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NW: $26k → 11%CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $29k → 11%ASPCA: $10k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF US: $96k → 14%SARVEY WILDLIFE: $10k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA: $20k → 9%CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NW: $20k → 11%CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $25k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF US: $50k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA: $10k → 9%KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $275k → 10%CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NW: $16k → 11%CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $25k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF US: $35k → 14%SEATTLE AREA FELINE RESCUE: $60k → 9%KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $255k → 10%CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NW: $12k → 11%CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $18k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF US: $25k → 14%SEATTLE AREA FELINE RESCUE: $20k → 9%KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $250k → 10%CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $16k → 11%KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $50k → 10%KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $40k → 10%MUSTLUVBOXERS RESCUE: $50k → 9%PASADOS SAFE HAVEN: $401k → 9%PASADOS SAFE HAVEN: $280k → 9%PASADOS SAFE HAVEN: $275k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1.0M → 9%PASADOS SAFE HAVEN: $275k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $151k → 9%PASADOS SAFE HAVEN: $100k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $45k → 9%OLD DOG HAVEN: $100k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 9%OLD DOG HAVEN: $8k → 9%RAINIER ANIMAL FUND: $20k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $30k → 9%SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE: $125k → 9%SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE: $105k → 9%SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE: $20k → 9%SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE: $15k → 9%SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE: $10k → 9%PAWSITIVE ALLIANCE: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 28 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
1

Total granted

$5.5M
$3k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +84%
  • TH
    THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +66%
  • PA
    Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $529k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • SD
    SEATTLE DOG HOMELESS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Basset Rescue

Dog rescue

Animals
2
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
Happy Tails Animal Rescue of Washin County Virginia
Animals
5
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
6
Columbia Gorge Humane Society

Columbia Gorge Humane Society is committed to promoting healthy, safe and lifelong relationships between people and their pets through sustainable programs of education, adoption and spay/neutering. We will endeavor to fight for the abused…

Animals
7
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
8
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
9
Casa Dog

No-kill, Volunteer dog rescue organization serving South King & Pierce County.

Animals
10
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
11
Rescue Coop
Animals
12
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pawsitive Alliance and the most unlike its peers is MustLuvBoxers Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN — $1,331,195 · AnimalsPASADO'S SAFE HAVENTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $1,286,325 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTYKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $870,113 · AnimalsKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETYProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS — $528,585 · AnimalsProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWSSAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE — $275,000 · AnimalsSAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE+16 more — $569,733 · Animals+16 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF US — $356,150 · OtherHUMANE SOCIET…Individual grant recipient — $140,398 · OtherIndividual gr…HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA — $104,245 · OtherHUMANE SOCIET…RAINIER ANIMAL FUND — $22,000 · Other+5 more — $22,377 · Other
Animals$4,860,951Other$645,170

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN — $1,331,195 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $1,286,325 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $870,113 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS — $528,585 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetSAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE — $275,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN — $120,046 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE — $112,110 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetSEATTLE AREA FELINE RESCUE FKA ANIMAL TALK RESCUE — $92,136 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST — $78,896 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMustLuvBoxers Rescue — $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPAWSITIVE ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetRAINIER ANIMAL FUND — $22,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONEY MEMORIAL PET CLINIC DBA DONEY COE PET CLINIC — $15,528 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWHISKER CITY — $10,226 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetMercer Island Eastside Orphans & Waifs — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREYHOUND PETS INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAT COALITION — $8,574 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetFORGOTTEN DOGS RESCUE — $7,623 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALLEY CAT PROJECT — $6,623 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSAVE-A-MUTT — $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDOG GONE SEATTLE — $3,574 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
  • Who funds KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS
  • Who funds SAVE A FORGOTTEN EQUINE
  • Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN
  • Who funds CENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds SEATTLE AREA FELINE RESCUE FKA ANIMAL TALK RESCUE
  • Who funds CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST
  • Who funds MustLuvBoxers Rescue
  • Who funds PAWSITIVE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds RAINIER ANIMAL FUND
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds DONEY MEMORIAL PET CLINIC DBA DONEY COE PET CLINIC
  • Who funds WHISKER CITY
  • Who funds Mercer Island Eastside Orphans & Waifs
  • Who funds GREYHOUND PETS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CAT COALITION
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN DOGS RESCUE
  • Who funds ALLEY CAT PROJECT
  • Who funds Charlies Foundation
  • Who funds SAVE-A-MUTT
  • Who funds DOG GONE SEATTLE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation - Mark · The Bungie Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Catania Family Foundation · Casey Family Programs · The Summerlee Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Svanee's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph