Skip to content

· Public charity

Sustainable Jersey

SUSTAINABLE JERSEY's mission is to empower new jersey communities to build a better world for future generations with the tools, training, technical assistance, and financial incentives necessary to pursue critical sustainability initiatives.

$588k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.4MEducation$1.4MCommunity Improvement$230kPublic Benefit$166kArts & Culture$115kRecreation & Sports$50kScience & Tech$20kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 31 grants below total $370,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $587,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $217,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOMERVILLE BOROUGH$20,000
MAPLEWOOD TOWNSHIP$20,000
HOWELL TOWNSHIP$20,000
HAINESPORT TOWNSHIP$20,000
LAMBERTVILLE CITY$20,000
BELLEVILLE TOWNSHIP$20,000
ROSA INTERNATIONAL MIDDLE SCHOOL$10,000
NORTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
LEAP ACADEMY UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
JOTHAM W WAKEMAN PS #6 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
BELMAR BOROUGH$10,000
FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
NUMBER 21 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
FANNY M HILLERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
HILLSIDE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TEWKSBURY TWP: $20k → 4%PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS TOWNSHIP: $10k → 4%MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP: $20k → 5%SPARTA TOWNSHIP: $10k → 6%OCEAN TOWNSHIP: $20k → 6%LEONIA BOROUGH: $30k → 7%LEONIA PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 7%EAST GREENWICH TOWNSHIP: $10k → 8%woodbine borough: $15k → 10%CAMDEN CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $30k → 12%JERSEY CITY: $30k → 14%BELLEVILLE TOWNSHIP: $20k → 16%CLINTON TOWN: $20k → 4%BURLINGTON CITY: $15k → 7%EDISON TOWNSHIP: $15k → 8%CAMDEN CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15k → 12%JERSEY CITY: $15k → 14%HOLLAND TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 4%HAINESPORT TOWNSHIP: $20k → 7%princeton: $18k → 11%hoboken city: $25k → 14%HOLLAND TOWNSHIP: $15k → 4%SOMERVILLE BOROUGH: $20k → 5%CHATHAM BOROUGH: $20k → 4%SOMERVILLE BOROUGH: $20k → 5%north plainfield school district: $15k → 10%ocean city: $15k → 10%LAMBERTVILLE CITY: $20k → 4%KENNEDY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $12k → 4%LAMBERTVILLE CITY: $20k → 4%ELIZABETH CITY: $20k → 10%AVALON BROUGH: $20k → 10%HAWTHORNE BOROUGH: $20k → 12%FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP: $20k → 5%EVESHAM TOWNSHIP: $20k → 7%TRENTON CITY: $20k → 11%MADISON BOROUGH: $20k → 4%WAYNE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15k → 12%HADDON TWP: $18k → 12%CALDWELL BOROUGH: $20k → 16%MAPLEWOOD TOWNSHIP: $20k → 16%ASBURY PARK CITY: $20k → 6%HOWELL TOWNSHIP: $20k → 6%MONTCLAIR TOWNSHIP: $20k → 16%BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP: $20k → 16%HOLMDEL TOWNSHIP: $20k → 6%CITY OF ORANGE TWP: $20k → 16%TINTON FALLS BOROUGH: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 72 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

72 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
154

Total granted

$1.7M
$1.5M

Still filing today

0%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TOMS RIVER REGIONAL SCHOOLS
    5× · 2018–2023 · $75k
  • CC
    CAMDEN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2019–2021 · $60k
  • CO
    CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE
    3× · 2019–2025 · $60k

Funded once

  • LB
    LEONIA BOROUGH
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • KE
    KENNEDY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • MH
    Montclair Health Dept
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Piscataway Township Education Foundation D/B/a Piscataway Education Foundation
—
2
Newark Charter School Fund Inc
—
3
District 100 Foundation

Educational advancement

Education
4
Bloomfield Educational Foundation

Provide grants to bloomfield, nj public schools, teachers and students. provide scholarships to bloomfield high school graduates.

Education
5
Pta New Jersey Congress of Parents & Teachers

To promote the welfare of students and foster relationships between parents, teachers and students

—
6
Woodcliff Lake Educational Foundation

Grants for education

—
7
Jackson Township High School Scholarship Fund Inc

To raise funds for scholarships awarded to graduating seniors of jackson township (nj) high school planning to further their education.

Education
8
Red Bank Parent Teacher Club

Benefit Teachers and Students of school

Unclassified
9
Pta New Jersey Congress of Parents and Teachers

Child advocacy

—
10
Pta New Jersey Congress of Parents & Teachers

Educational/charitable

—
11
Haytown Road Nursery School

Operation of a nursery school

Education
12
Pta New Jersey Congress of Parents & Teachers

EducationalCharitable

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leap Academy University Charter School; the most unlike its peers is Millburn Township Co-Op Nursery School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+193 more: $3,115,811 · Other+193 moreLEAP ACADEMY UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationWILDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI & FRIENDS INC: $5,000 · EducationORADELL FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationJERSEY CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15,000 · Community ImprovementTownship of Mahwah Youth Sports Boosters Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBORDENTOWN CITY CATS INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$3,115,811Education$30,000Community Improvement$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$5,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJERSEY CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLEAP ACADEMY UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTownship of Mahwah Youth Sports Boosters Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBORDENTOWN CITY CATS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetORADELL FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 21% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Jersey Health Officers AssociationNJ57.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Jersey Health Officers Association · The Leary Firefighters Foundation · Family Health Initiatives Inc · Partners for Health Inc · Digital Promise Global · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · National Arbor Day Foundation · New Jersey League of Conservation Voters Education Fund · Delta Dental of New Jersey Foundation Inc · National Recreation and Park Association · Save the Music Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sustainable Jersey funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sustainable Jersey. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sustainable Jersey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph