Loading…
· Public charity
Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythi
To promote the ideals of friendship through altruistic and benevolent endeavors
$10k
Granted FY2025
2
Grants
2
Communities
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Food & Nutrition$75kHealth$27kHuman Services$20kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$5k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
cancer
2020
food
2021
food
2022
reliefpower
2023
pythianchildrencarealzheimer's
2024
alzheimer's
2025
memorypreservecountry
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
- The Community Fo$5,000
- Happy Canyon Fou$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$105k · 3 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
4
Total granted
$105k
$28k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+37%
+109%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Feeding America2× · 2020–2021 · $75k · revenue +77%- TPTx Pythian Home2× · 2018–2023 · $15k · revenue +37%
- AAAlzheimers Assoc2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- ACAmerican Cancerone grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue -8%
- KCKentucky Chambergraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +215%
- ARAmerican Red Croone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
National Council of Farmer Cooperatives
Promote interests of cooperative farm industry.
—
2
Personal Care Products Council
Improving the quality of life of patients undergoing cancer treatment.
Health
3
American Culinary Federation Inc
Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession
—
4
American Gas Association
American gas association (the association) is an advocate for natural gas utility companies and their customers. the association helps natural gas utilities achieve operational excellence in the safe, reliable and efficient delivery of…
—
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of
Leader in medical regulation, serving as an innovative catalyst for effective policy & standards.
Health
6
Arizona Community Foundation
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Philanthropy
7
Dallas Citizens Council
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
—
8
American Health Care Association
The american health care association is a non-profit federation of affiliate state health organizations, together representing more than 14,000 non-profit and for-profit nursing, assisted living, developmentally - disabled, and sub-acute…
—
9
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company
To provide professional investment management and related services for the funds under management and control of the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System.
Education
10
Memorial Hermann Community Benefit
Test and measure innovative solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community.
Social Science
11
Legacy Health Foundation
Legacy Health Foundation's mission is to foster charitable giving as well as community commitment and involvement to support the founding principles, mission and vision of legacy health and promote the health and well-being of the…
Health
12
Common Cause
Common cause is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of american democracy. we work to ensure open, honest, and accountable government; to promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of the Texas and the most unlike its peers is Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Food & Nutrition$75,000Health$26,955Human Services$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$6,000Education$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythi funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Tx Pythian Home.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 756085616 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Tx Pythian Home, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythi?
Find your warmest path to Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythi through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines